answersLogoWhite

0

well for one, the compact was most definitely not a constitution.

and although some signs of democracy were shown...there was a lot of unfairness... only 41 males actually signed the document, those men were land owners and prominent members of the church. so it wasn't like a 'all for one, and one for all :D" kind of situation.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?