President Truman said, he needed to end the war and collapse Japan's means to make war ever again.
he was very wrong he should have dropped it on just the government.
No atomic bombs were dropped after the war ! The two 'test' bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki before the second world war ended. It was the result of the devastation the bombs caused that brought the war to an end.
i think that what might have happened if the japan had ignored the atomic bomb warning was that they wouldn't have that much buildingdestroyed would have just let everything how it was before and surrender right when the united states told the Japanese that they were launching the atomic bombs Japanese said i hate you USA(THEY REALLY DINT SAY THAT BUT YOU GET MY POINT) but they never gave up until September 2,1945 japan surrenders and world war 2 was over!!!
World War 2 ended officially on 2 September 1945 right after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan and Japan surrendered. But World War 2 ended in Europe when Adolf Hitler commited Suicide on 30 April 1945.
This question doesn't have a yes or no answer. You can't say that dropping two atomic bombs that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people is right. Yet you can't say that saving probably over a million of soldiers lives by dropping the bomb wasn't right. Dropping the atomic bombs has it's pro's and con's.
The atomic bombs were dropped on August 6 and August 9, 1945 by the end of the stage of World War 2. The causes World War 2 to become the first nuclear war had ever happened. Right now, the atomic bombs are called nuclear bombs and were dropped in Japan (the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki).
sure?
Russia
he was very wrong he should have dropped it on just the government.
No atomic bombs were dropped after the war ! The two 'test' bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki before the second world war ended. It was the result of the devastation the bombs caused that brought the war to an end.
At the end of World War II, few questioned Truman's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most Americans accepted the obvious reasoning: the atomic bombings brought the war to a more timely end. They did not have a problem with over one hundred thousand of the enemy being killed. After all, the Japanese attacked America, and not the other way around. In later years, however, many have begun to question the conventional wisdom of "Truman was saving lives," putting forth theories of their own. However, when one examines the issue with great attention to the results of the atomic bombings and compares these results with possible alternatives to using said bombs, the line between truth and fiction begins to clear. Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was for the purpose of saving lives and ending the war quickly in order to prevent a disastrous land invasion.
i think that what might have happened if the japan had ignored the atomic bomb warning was that they wouldn't have that much buildingdestroyed would have just let everything how it was before and surrender right when the united states told the Japanese that they were launching the atomic bombs Japanese said i hate you USA(THEY REALLY DINT SAY THAT BUT YOU GET MY POINT) but they never gave up until September 2,1945 japan surrenders and world war 2 was over!!!
if we never dropped that bomb the Japanese wouldn't have ever stopped trying
World War 2 ended officially on 2 September 1945 right after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan and Japan surrendered. But World War 2 ended in Europe when Adolf Hitler commited Suicide on 30 April 1945.
Utilitarianism is a way of life, where one determines the right actions to make. The most common example of utilitarianism is the U.S dropping the atomic bombs on Japan after WWII.
This question doesn't have a yes or no answer. You can't say that dropping two atomic bombs that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people is right. Yet you can't say that saving probably over a million of soldiers lives by dropping the bomb wasn't right. Dropping the atomic bombs has it's pro's and con's.
The radiation levels of atomic bombs vary according to the amount of radioactive elements put into the bombs or missiles and if they are actually used. Once the radioactive matter is inside the bomb housing the radiation levels are negligible but once one of the nuclear bombs is used then the variables come into play. (see related link below to see how complex it is) Consider this: the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in 1945 are 1/10th the killing power of today's nuclear missiles. If one modern nuclear missile were to be used today the bomb would be able to kill about a third of the world with the initial bomb blast and radiation fallout. The radiation level after Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not really measured until after the US occupied Japan. The Japanese leaders did not really understand the radiation fallout and poisonous danger and they did not use radiation detectors right after the blast. It is rumored the radiation levels were 100 times today's acceptable levels of radiation.