answersLogoWhite

0

Was lenin a poor leader to the people of russia?

Updated: 8/16/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Best Answer

The answer is no, he had a vision put it into action it worked but it was not right for Russia at the time they were simply not ready for his changes because the country was backward compared to other western countries in many ways

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was lenin a poor leader to the people of russia?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why did Lenin appeal to the people of Russia?

Lenin famously said "Peace, Land, And Bread" because it was the main thing the people wanted. He appealed to the majority of people because he sided with the poor and middle classes which most Russians were at the time, so his idea to help their living standards were very popular.


Is Russia a poor country?

Russia is just a developing country in IMF and WB lists.The net wealth per capita in 2011 was just 8200 $ ,1/23 of the net wealth for istance of an italian citizen.Yes,Russia is a poor country.


Who set up Communism in Russia?

vladimir lenin In actuality, "communism" was never set up in any country. Lenin set out to set up and did set up socialism, although it was a very poor example of it.


Was Nicholas II the leader of Germany?

No, he was the leader of Russia until he abdicated because of his poor leadership skills in March 1917 after the February Revolution.


What is a proletariat in Russia?

Proletariat = workers and poor people of Russia. It is derived from French vocabulary.


How many people are poor in Russia?

over 380 million live in poverty in russia


Why did he start the Soviet Union?

Russia used to have an autocratic royal family. In the early 20th century, Vladimir Lenin led the Red Revolution, which led to the overthrow of Romanov rule in Russia and the obliteration of the royal family and their allies. From then, Lenin created the USSR. What sparked the Red Revolution was the Czar's poor handling of WW1 and the economy, amongst others.


What was life like for the peasants in russia under lenin rule?

The peasants lived a poor and tough life. Many of them were freed slaves, but their lives didn't improve much since slavery.


What was the difference between the rich and the poor in russia ww1?

poor people could not efford things to survive


Why did the revolution occur in Russia?

There was a revolution in Russia, because, many people were starving, there was too much discrepancy between the rich and the poor. Russia was beaten badly by the Axis in WWI. The Russian rulers were incompetent, selfish people who got their power because they were born into it. There were too many things wrong with the country and the only way most people felt that positive changes could be brought about was with a revolution. Lenin was a very convincing speaker who gave the people the idea that he had better ideas to solve the country's problems than the Czar, Nicholas did.


Is Russia a poor or rich country?

Russia is rich in terms of government, however, its citizens are not as well off. The citizens of Russia do not make enough to be considered rich, but they are definitely not poor (the GDP per capita of Russia is more than 1.5x the world average).


Who brought the government of communism to Russia?

That was Lenin's goal but after he died Stalin took over and killed many people because he wanted socialism. Lenin did not change Russia into a communist state. He changed it into a socialist sate. This was his purpose all along regardless of the fact that Stalin turned everything into a totalitarian dictatorship. According to Karl Marx, the capitalist society would become a socialist one first, then after generations of socialism it would evolve into communism. Communism is not something that can be imposed on any society, but socialism is. Lenin wanted to start that process so after his revolution he abolished all aspects of capitalism in favor of socialism. Although they called it socialism, it was a very poor imitation of what Karl Marx envisioned. In fact, even calling it an imitation of socialism is going too far.