Probably, given Marbury's case may have been politically motivated, rather than driven by a real desire to serve as justice of the peace. This idea is supported by the fact that Marshall clearly explained Marbury's suit could be addressed by the courts, but had to be refiled in the lower courts. Since Marbury never refiled, it appears Marshall's public scolding of President Jefferson, combined with the decision's reinforcement of the Federalist-dominated Judicial branch, was satisfying enough.
It's not clear how actively Marbury (or his fellow plaintiffs) would have performed the duties of justice of the peace had the commissions been delivered, because Marbury was already a weathy man with numerous business interests.
The official citation of the case is Marbury v. Madison,5 US 137 (1803)
Marbury vs Madison was an ingenious decision. Marbury vs Madison was the first case of judicial review that voided the act of congress.
The Supreme court decision on Marbury version Madison by the federal judiciary. This is part of the court systems.
Judicial Review
The effect of the landmark Supreme court decision in Marbury vs Madison helped in the separation of powers as far as the executive and legislature is concerned.
Marbury v. Madison
No. Marbury v. Madison, (1803) didn't even touch on states' rights.
Judicial Review
The Court through Chief Justice Marshall unanimously decided not to require Madison to deliver the commission to Marbury.
Marbury vs. Madison
how can wants be satisfied
Judicial review
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)Marbury v. Madison was an essentially meaningless case argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1803 in which the Court asserted the power of the Supreme Court to decide whether or not laws were constitutional. THAT is its lasting legacy, and every SCOTUS decision since cites Marbury v. Madison as their authority.For more information, see Related Questions, below.