Yes, rearmament during the 1930's was avoidable.
During the disarmament conference at Geneva, the League of Nations, along with the US and the Sovier Union could have agreed to the limits of weapon to disarm and ignore their country's external sercurity.
In October 1933, Hitler had pulled Germany out of the Disarmament Conference because he wanted military equality. Hitler then annouced he was going to rearm. By 1935 he had increased the size of his army from 100 000 men to 550 000 men and had introduced conscription for all male citizens. Even though Hitler had broken the Treaty of Versailles no one was prepared to go against him and enforce the terms in the treaty. Hence, Hitler was abe to keep his army. His armament and military performance in the Spanish civil war had brought Europe's attention. They had seen how powerful and strong Germany were, and thus, countries near Germany starting rearming. Therefore
When Germany pursued rearmament in the 1930s, America had a weak response. America and the other Allies could have strongly objected since it was in direct violation of the Treaty of Versailles.
yes it was avoidable
the dictatorship
japan
dirigible
When Germany pursued rearmament in the 1930s, America had a weak response. America and the other Allies could have strongly objected since it was in direct violation of the Treaty of Versailles.
i don't know y they is making me di thsi cuz i don't no da answer im tryna figure itout but they ain't giving me nothing WOWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
avoidable and treatable is
Yes, "avoidable" is a word. It is an adjective used to describe something that can be prevented or escaped.
if violence was avoidable
yes it was avoidable
I wish this exercise was avoidable.
how much does fruit cost in the 1930s?
Yes.
During the 1930s internationalists wanted the US to take a more active role in world affairs.
During WWII they just kind of ignored it. They wanted to remain isolated from the conflicts in Europe after WWI.
the 1930s