It was caused by economics but quickly became a political event.
It began for economic reasons and quickly became a political event.
Romantics; Victorians
The second phase of the French Revolution, often referred to as the Radical Phase, occurred due to increasing discontent with the moderate reforms of the early revolution and the rising threats from both internal and external enemies. Economic hardship, political instability, and the fear of counter-revolution fueled radical groups like the Jacobins, who sought more profound social and political changes. The execution of King Louis XVI in 1793 marked a shift toward more extreme measures, leading to the Reign of Terror, where perceived enemies of the revolution were ruthlessly suppressed. This phase ultimately aimed to defend the revolution against its adversaries and implement a more egalitarian society.
in its immediate and long term effects, the Russian revolution was more like the French Revolution than the American revolution. the American revolution expanded English political ideas into a constitutional government that built on many existing structures. in contrast, both the Russian and french revolutions attempted to destroy existing social and political structures.
in its immediate and long term effects, the Russian revolution was more like the French Revolution than the American revolution. the American revolution expanded English political ideas into a constitutional government that built on many existing structures. in contrast, both the Russian and french revolutions attempted to destroy existing social and political structures.
The french revolution was more like a revolution as lt literary says.
in its immediate and long term effects, the Russian revolution was more like the French Revolution than the American revolution. the American revolution expanded English political ideas into a constitutional government that built on many existing structures. in contrast, both the Russian and french revolutions attempted to destroy existing social and political structures.
There was a strong political divide in the United States as to how to view the French Revolution. At the beginning, the majority perspective was positive, seeing the French Revolution as being parallel to the American Revolution. The minority perspective, which became more popular later, was that this upsurge against the traditional order was violent and unnecessary.
The French political system needed to change due to widespread discontent with existing governance, characterized by corruption, inefficiency, and a disconnect from the needs of the populace. This unrest was amplified by economic hardships and social inequalities, leading to demands for greater representation and reform. Additionally, the desire for a more democratic and participatory system emerged, particularly in response to authoritarian tendencies. Ultimately, these factors culminated in significant political upheaval, notably the French Revolution, which sought to establish a more equitable and responsive government.
The French people were living under harsh conditions prior to the French Revolution. They lower classes were more heavily taxed than the upper classes causing a serious disparity in wealth.. The cost of food was very high and availability scarce for the poor. The peasants has little to no social, political, or economic power, and even less religious freedom.
I'm a Napoleon supporter so I have more good to say about him than bad ha. However, Napoleon in many ways went against the ideals of the Revolution. Firstly, the French Revolution fought for democracy but Napoleon was a dictator. Secondly, one other ideal of the French Revolution is to have checks and balances within the government but Napoleon made almost all the political decisions on his own. Overall, Napoleon's style of government was closer to absolutism which was a big no-no of the French Revolution.
they are different because, economic progress is more into money business and other things and political progress is more into What People Are Doing.