answersLogoWhite

0

Was the Yalta agreement a mistake?

User Avatar

Anonymous

13y ago
Updated: 8/18/2019

It was long thought that it had been a mistake to make an agreement with Stalin, who was very treacherous and who did not fulfill his obligations, however in the end the Soviet Empire collapsed anyway, and the Yalta agreement became irrelevant. Whether anything would have worked out better if the Yalta agreement had not been signed, would be impossible to know.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What year was the Yalta agreement?

The year the Yalta Agreement was 1945.


What was the Yalta agreements?

The year the Yalta Agreement was 1945.


The Yalta agreement did what?

divided Berlin into four zones of occupation.


What evidence is there that the West had justification to mistrust the Soviets?

the solviets had violated the yalta agreement


Did the cold war start in 1946?

The exact date of the start is debated upon. However, the common agreement is that i started at the Yalta Conference between US, USSR and the UK. The Yalta conference was in August 1945.


After the Yalta conference what leader went back on the alleged agreement to hold for you elections in Eastern Europe?

Joseph Stalin


How did Joseph Stalin violate the Yalta Agreement?

He took over Poland and the Soviet Union STILL didn't enter the war against Japan.


As part of the yalta agreement all of Germany was given to the Soviet Union true or false?

False , West Germany was givien to the Soviet Union.


What agreement between Roosevelt and Stalin at the Yalta conference generated the most criticisms of Roosevelt after the war?

agreements concerning soviet territorial demands


What country is split into zones by the Yalta agreement?

The Yalta Conference was a meeting between the leaders of the three main allied powers of World War II, Franklin Roosevelt (United States), Winston Churchill (United Kingdom) and Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union). The meeting took place in the Crimean city of Yalta during February 4-11, 1945. The three leaders agreed that after World War II, Germany would be divided into four separate zones, with the United Kingdom, Soviet Union, France and United States all administering a zone.


The 1945 agreement at Yalta between Roosevelt Churchill and Stalin called for?

a post-war military occupation of Germany and the entry of Russia into the war with Japan


What difference between sin and mistake?

A Sin Is Somthing That You Do On A Purpose Issue, A Mistake Is Like: You Fall On Something, Trip, Scratch, (Mistake) That Does Not Matter At All. And In contract law, a mistake is an erroneous belief, at contracting, that certain facts are true. It can be argued as a defence, and if raised successfully can lead to the agreement in question being found void ab initio or voidable, or alternatively an equitable remedy may be provided by the courts. Common law has identified three different types of mistake in contract: the 'unilateral mistake', the 'mutual mistake' and the 'common mistake'. It is important to note the distinction between the 'common mistake' and the 'mutual mistake'.Mistake can be- (1)Mistake of Law (2)Mistake of FactMistake of law: when a party enters into a contract, without the knowledge of the law in the country, the contract is affected by such mistakes but it is not void. A contract is not voidable because it was caused by a mistake as to any law in force in India. The reason here is that ignorance of law is not an excuse at all. However if a party is induced to enter into a contract by the mistake of law then such a contract is not valid. Illustration A and B make a contract grounded on the erroneous belief that a particular debt is barred by the Indian law of Limitation; the contract is not voidable.Mistake of Fact: Where both the parties into an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is void. Explanation: An erroneous opinion as to the value of the thing which forms the subject-matter of the agreement is not to be deemed a mistake as to a matter of fact.Illustration: (1) A agrees to buy a certain horse from B. It turns out that the horse was dead at the time of bargain, through neither party was aware of the fact. The agreement is void. (2) A, being entitled to an estate for the life to B, agrees to sell it to C. B was dead at the time of an agreement, but both the parties were ignorant of the fact. The agreement is void.