The absence of the U.S. was a large factor in the failure of the League of Nations, but the root cause of the failure of the League was that it had no real power. It was essentially the U.N. without a securtity council to enforce it's directives.
The main reason that the League of Nations failed, was that the countries only thought for themselves.The absence of the U.S. was a large factor in the failure of the League of Nations, but the root cause of the failure of the League was that it had no real power.
Since the League of Nations is now defunct, there is probably no reason for them to now.
no.
The LoN did not actually enforce any of it's decisions. That's actually the reason for it's monumental failure and un-regretted demise. The was no component of the League able to apply political or military pressure on a member or non-member state.
Solve international disputes and Woodrow Wilson's fourteen points
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
Yes, and that was the reason Sweden lost the Swedish speaking Åland islands to Finland.
cuz we don't mess with no british folk
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
The main reason was that United States would be forced to join any war which would have outburst.