The LoN did not actually enforce any of it's decisions. That's actually the reason for it's monumental failure and un-regretted demise. The was no component of the League able to apply political or military pressure on a member or non-member state.
The league of nations did not have much power because it did not have its own force.
No, it did not. That is often cited as its greatest flaw.
The League of Nations
They felt the United Nations lacked the power to enforce its decisions.
One of the reasons that the league of Nations failed in their mission was that they did not have any military power. The league of Nations was formed to bring a lasting peace to Europe but failed because they could not enforce any of their ideas.
Had no standing army and no real power to enforce its decrees
The Iroquois league affected it's nations by not fighting and living peacefully. ;) have a nice day!
Probably not. The League of Nations had no power to enforce any resolution passed and the US public wasn't very interested in "Europe's problem".
The League of Nations had no armed forces, and had no means of punishing other countries that engaged in things that the League of Nations was created to defeat, like embargo, military buildups, antagonism between nations, etc. In other words, it had no teeth
Because, unlike the United Nations, it never had even close to total membership of the countries of the world. Strong nations like America and Russia not joining meant the League could not enforce its decisions. When Russia eventually joined, it then left - as did Germany. Showing that if a nation disagreed with the League, it was easy to leave, and be outside their jurisdiction. The same happened with Japan, which was even a permanent member of its Security Council, with withdrew when it was criticised for invading Manchuria.
The other nations at the conference didn't accept them. They were in favor of punishing the Central Powers, not solving problems. The fourteenth point was accepted, but the League of Nationa had many, many flaws. The most deadly was that it had no army or power to enforce its decisions.
The other nations at the conference didn't accept them. They were in favor of punishing the Central Powers, not solving problems. The fourteenth point was accepted, but the League of Nationa had many, many flaws. The most deadly was that it had no army or power to enforce its decisions.
Some argue that the greatest blow to the League of Nations' power was the refusal of the United States to join. US President Woodrow Wilson was a major advocate of the League (not to mention instrumental in its founding), but the US Senate still turned down membership. The League hoped the US would play a major diplomatic and financial role in the League, but with the US' refusal to join, these benefits would not come to pass. Other weaknesses include that the League had no military force to speak of, and no means of enforcing the resolutions it passed. Thus they relied on the more powerful members (like Great Britain and France) to help enforce decisions. However, since a pacifist attitude was prevalent in those nations at the time, nations like Britain and France were reluctant to have their militaries used to enforce the League's resolutions.
You see, the League of Nations has been proposing various solutions to many of the world crises before the second world war. Yet the League did not prove very effective, since it had no real power to enforce its propositions.