The LoN did not actually enforce any of it's decisions. That's actually the reason for it's monumental failure and un-regretted demise. The was no component of the League able to apply political or military pressure on a member or non-member state.
The League of Nations
They felt the United Nations lacked the power to enforce its decisions.
One of the reasons that the league of Nations failed in their mission was that they did not have any military power. The league of Nations was formed to bring a lasting peace to Europe but failed because they could not enforce any of their ideas.
Had no standing army and no real power to enforce its decrees
Probably not. The League of Nations had no power to enforce any resolution passed and the US public wasn't very interested in "Europe's problem".
The Iroquois league affected it's nations by not fighting and living peacefully. ;) have a nice day!
The absence of armed forces in the League of Nations significantly weakened its ability to enforce decisions and maintain peace. Without military power, the League struggled to deter aggression from member states, leading to failures in conflicts such as the Manchurian Crisis and the invasion of Abyssinia. This lack of enforcement capability ultimately undermined the League's credibility and effectiveness, contributing to its inability to prevent the outbreak of World War II.
The League of Nations had no armed forces, and had no means of punishing other countries that engaged in things that the League of Nations was created to defeat, like embargo, military buildups, antagonism between nations, etc. In other words, it had no teeth
Because, unlike the United Nations, it never had even close to total membership of the countries of the world. Strong nations like America and Russia not joining meant the League could not enforce its decisions. When Russia eventually joined, it then left - as did Germany. Showing that if a nation disagreed with the League, it was easy to leave, and be outside their jurisdiction. The same happened with Japan, which was even a permanent member of its Security Council, with withdrew when it was criticised for invading Manchuria.
The other nations at the conference didn't accept them. They were in favor of punishing the Central Powers, not solving problems. The fourteenth point was accepted, but the League of Nationa had many, many flaws. The most deadly was that it had no army or power to enforce its decisions.
The other nations at the conference didn't accept them. They were in favor of punishing the Central Powers, not solving problems. The fourteenth point was accepted, but the League of Nationa had many, many flaws. The most deadly was that it had no army or power to enforce its decisions.
You see, the League of Nations has been proposing various solutions to many of the world crises before the second world war. Yet the League did not prove very effective, since it had no real power to enforce its propositions.