No. The Battle of Hastings was an invasion of England for money and power, not religion. Crusades were conquests to convert the world to Christianity. They invaded Jerusalem several times.
Hastings. The actual battle took place about 10 km nw of Hastings.
the fryd were part time warriors who weren't that good at fighting<3
Duke William the Second of Normandy defeated King Harold the Second of Wessex at the Battle of Hastings. The battle occurred in October 1066 and Harold was killed.
He didn't and Hastings played no part in the battle. The Saxon King Harold arranged for his army to gather at the "hoar (grey and old) apple tree", a familiar landmark that the men would have known, sited on a ridge which would give the English a defensive high ground position. This was at the place now called Battle, not at Hastings. This ridge at Battle was a very strong position with marshes and ditches in front and around it, commanding the main route from Hastings to London - the route that William had to take. Given sufficient troops, Harold could have held the position indefinitely and William would have lost.
Battle of Hastings was in 1066, which is the last part of the dark ages although it is referred to as the early middle ages up until about the last of the 10th century, the dark ages are roughly the time of the fall of the Roman Empire, 476 A.D. to 1450, and the middle ages fit in between until moder times at the 15th century. Not sure about the modern era time line..
Hastings. The actual battle took place about 10 km nw of Hastings.
i fink he fought in battle of hastings 1st
It was a battle (part of a bigger conflict) and was known as the Battle of Bannockburn. It took place in Bannockburn (strangely enough) in Scotland.
it was part of a bigger battle
it is a part ofa castle
William Norman was a vital part of the Battle of Hastings. He led the troops, planned out the strategies and ensured the victory through his careful planning.
Yes, the larger "conflict" was WWI.
He had little part in the battle. He stood with the elves, but was knocked out by a rock early in the conflict.
It was William Duke of Normandy. Who later became William the Conqueror due to the Norman conquest, which this battle was a part of.
the fryd were part time warriors who weren't that good at fighting<3
Yes!!! Harold Godwienson got crowned king during the battle of Hastings! But not for long. Harold Godwienson beat Harald Hadraada in the 1st part but then he unfortunately got killed by William the Conqueror.
Duke William the Second of Normandy defeated King Harold the Second of Wessex at the Battle of Hastings. The battle occurred in October 1066 and Harold was killed.