it was good because It change a lot for the union
He was impeached in 1868, mainly because of his opposition to the Radicals Republicans Reconstruction's Plan, particularly against the Fourteenth Amendment.
It doesn't designate if a person is "good" or "bad", but it gives the rights that all people have until proven guilty.
union is good confederate is bad
I think that he was sometimes good and sometimes bad. He wanted communism to start back up in the Soviet Union.
NO its very bad for all of the parents that have kids that go to public schools.
in europe it was summer rains and bad weather
It was good a good and sound policy. it allowed American tensions between American and the Soviet Union to be decreased.
nada
It Resulted in crop failureFamine.
In a bad relationship with the Soviet Union.
It depends entirely on the nature of the amendment to the indictment. Usually an amendment is neutral for the person being charged because the amendment is to factual parts of the allegations, e.g. replacing third-party "John Does" with actual names of people or more factual incidents. In other cases, it can be positive or negative if the amendment is about removing or adding (respectively) criminal allegations.
The relative importance of Constitutional amendments is a matter of personal preference and also of some debate. The four-part First Amendment is high on most peoples' lists, but is the Second Amendment or the Sixth Amendment more crucial?The Third Amendment is rarely considered, and the extremely important 9th and 10th Amendments are widely ignored in legal jurisprudence. Is this good or bad?