answersLogoWhite

0

it was good because It change a lot for the union

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is a bad thind Andrew Johnson did while president?

He was impeached in 1868, mainly because of his opposition to the Radicals Republicans Reconstruction's Plan, particularly against the Fourteenth Amendment.


How does the 4th amendment apply to good and bad people?

It doesn't designate if a person is "good" or "bad", but it gives the rights that all people have until proven guilty.


What were the colonies in the civil war called?

union is good confederate is bad


Was mikhail gorbachev a good or bad leader?

I think that he was sometimes good and sometimes bad. He wanted communism to start back up in the Soviet Union.


Is the teachers union good?

NO its very bad for all of the parents that have kids that go to public schools.


What resulted in crop failure in the early fourteenth century?

in europe it was summer rains and bad weather


Was Nixon's policy of detente good or bad for the US?

It was good a good and sound policy. it allowed American tensions between American and the Soviet Union to be decreased.


What was the bad things about the 19th amendment?

nada


Summer rains and bad weather in Europe in the early fourteenth century resulted in .?

It Resulted in crop failureFamine.


Relationship between japan and the United States following world war 2?

In a bad relationship with the Soviet Union.


If the state files an amendment to an indictment is that good or bad for the person being charged?

It depends entirely on the nature of the amendment to the indictment. Usually an amendment is neutral for the person being charged because the amendment is to factual parts of the allegations, e.g. replacing third-party "John Does" with actual names of people or more factual incidents. In other cases, it can be positive or negative if the amendment is about removing or adding (respectively) criminal allegations.


What 3 amendments are most important and why?

The relative importance of Constitutional amendments is a matter of personal preference and also of some debate. The four-part First Amendment is high on most peoples' lists, but is the Second Amendment or the Sixth Amendment more crucial?The Third Amendment is rarely considered, and the extremely important 9th and 10th Amendments are widely ignored in legal jurisprudence. Is this good or bad?