If you are refering to the American Civil War, niether had support from European countries. The South wanted the aid of the British, and tried many times to break the North's naval blockade. The South depreately needed the aid of Britain, not militarily, but finacialy. The South needed some place to sell the cotton they grew, since they were unable to do so they suffered from 7000% inflation at the end of the war. One could write a whole masters thesis on Europes effects on the Civil War.
No they weren't.
The North Sea
asia, africa ,north america ,south america, australia
Denmark is located in Northern Europe. South of Norway, west of Sweden, north of Germany.
continents Continents: North America, South America, Australia, Antarctica, Europe, Africa and Asia (Europe, Asia and Africa are on the same land mass). Other landmasses include Greenland, Svalbard, Iceland, Indonesia and many other islands.
· Nashville (Tennessee), battle of · New Hope Church (Georgia), battle of · New Market (Virginia), battle of · North · North Anna (Virginia), battle of ·
The north had more advantages, the south had more allies.
they befriended the negus.
Europe north or south Korea
Everyone in the United States and Europe was also placed in jeoprady. The South's cotton had mostly gone there, and both the North and the South needed European Allies.
no, they didn't. The UK was helping the south though.
The are Soviet Union, countries from the Eastern Europe, China, Mongolia, North Korea, Vietnam.
No that was not the case.
so they could get the Germans out of North Africa.
The three principle products of the North during the Civil War were, textiles, lumber, and clothing.
Zebulon Vance served as North Carolina's governor during the Civil War.
The three principle products of the North during the Civil War were, textiles, lumber, and clothing.
North