Want this question answered?
A strength of Britain was they had a trained Army. A weakness was they were fighting over something that was completely pointless. The patriots strength was they had people who were dedicated to making themselves free. And a weakness was they didn't have quit as many people or weapons as Britain did. Everyone deserves to be free. (Unless they murdered some one)
Weakness: states had more power than the central government, they congress could not form an army Strengnth: first unified government after the revolution
Weakness: states had more power than the central government, they congress could not form an army Strengnth: first unified government after the revolution
strength of Indian army
It did not provide for an executive or judicial branch.
A strength of Britain was they had a trained Army. A weakness was they were fighting over something that was completely pointless. The patriots strength was they had people who were dedicated to making themselves free. And a weakness was they didn't have quit as many people or weapons as Britain did. Everyone deserves to be free. (Unless they murdered some one)
Strange as it may sound, Egypt was both Cleopatra's weakness and her strength. It was her strength because of its wealth and its ability to hire what it needed. It was her weakness because other countries, Rome in particular, posed a threat to Egypt because of that wealth. Egypt had no army to speak of, so there was no defense against any attack except by the aid of allies, which Cleopatra did not have. So her main weakness was her lack of military resources.
Weakness: states had more power than the central government, they congress could not form an army Strengnth: first unified government after the revolution
the first ruler to have an army was akkadians
Foreign Soil
Foreign Soil
Sparta's military strength was their army, witch was the best in Ancient Greece.