A strength of Britain was they had a trained Army. A weakness was they were fighting over something that was completely pointless. The patriots strength was they had people who were dedicated to making themselves free. And a weakness was they didn't have quit as many people or weapons as Britain did. Everyone deserves to be free. (Unless they murdered some one)
To be on the safer side, for your job interview preparations -this article attached provides examples on how to answer the question "what are your weaknesses and strengths?".
SWOT is as an acronym for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.The goal of SWOT is to analyze each category individually and then see what you can change or improve.Strengths and Weaknesses are looked at from the internal side of a company where Opportunities and Threats are looked at externally.
Mexico has an efficient work force which is unparalleled this side of Asia, but they also have an outdated government which is even more corrupt than that of the US.
It is subjective to say who the worst Jedi ever was. Each Jedi had their own strengths and weaknesses. Anakin Skywalker is often considered one of the most controversial Jedi due to his fall to the dark side and becoming Darth Vader.
A balanced argument text presents multiple viewpoints on an issue, acknowledges both strengths and weaknesses of each perspective, provides evidence and examples to support each viewpoint, and aims to present a fair and objective analysis without bias towards one side.
George Washington
George Washington
General Ulysses S. Grant's strengths during the Vicksburg campaign included his strategic planning and ability to adapt to changing circumstances, which ultimately led to a successful siege. His focus on logistics and supply lines also played a crucial role in sustaining his army. Conversely, his weaknesses included initial underestimations of Confederate defenses and challenges in coordinating his forces effectively, which prolonged the campaign. On the Confederate side, General John C. Pemberton's strengths lay in his defensive position and knowledge of the terrain, allowing him to initially hold Vicksburg against Grant's advances. However, his weaknesses included limited resources and reinforcements, as well as difficulties in communication and strategy, which ultimately led to the city's surrender.
The Battle of King's Mountain does not have an exact count for the unit strengths of both sides. However, it is commonly held that each side had around 1000 men.
each of the Cherokee were either on the Britain's' side or the americans' side. so yes they were in the revolutionary war. but it was NEVER mentioned!!!!
To provide a balanced view of someone's character, it's important to recognize both their strengths and weaknesses. On the positive side, he may have been compassionate, demonstrating empathy and support for others, and showcasing a strong work ethic and determination in his pursuits. Conversely, his negative traits could include impulsiveness or stubbornness, which may have led to conflicts or poor decision-making at times. This duality reflects the complexity of human nature, where strengths and weaknesses often coexist.
Assuming you are referring to the strengths of each side in the campaign, Grant had superior intelligence, superior numbers, freedom of movement, superior supplies, and superior communications. Pemberton had superior position and his troops had the home field advantage.