Actually, no. He cautioned against political parties and didn't belong to one.
The Constitution of the United States never mentions political parties. Political parties did spring up as a natural reaction to the constitution's slightly vague limits on federal powers. One party opposed many federal powers, while the other supported increased federal powers.
In political terms, nothing. Both are political entities owned by the federation as a whole and are the cities where the political powers (executive, legislative, supreme court) reside. In other terms, Washington DC is a medium-sized city with 618,000 inhabitants, while Mexico City is a megalopolis with 21.16 million inhabitants.
Washington opposed political parties. He had led an army consisting of people from all walks of life. Americans were willing to obey army rules if they knew why they existed. British solders had to be whipped into shape. That was why Americans made better solders. He believed political parties would divide Americans into special interest groups. On the other hand, Jefferson saw that Congress levied taxes on people on the frontier, the group least able to pay them. He favored political parties giving the downtrodden a voice.
Washington was a member of no political party.
The Soviet
more enthusiastic most enthusiastic
George Washington was a "Federalist," although in his time, there weren't clear-cut political parties. Washington himself was set against any divisions brought on by political parties.
Washington Washington
No. Washington didn’t believe in political parties and there weren’t political parties in 1789.
The past tense of enthusiastic is "enthused".
George Washington
enthusiastically is the state of being enthusiastic enthusiastic is having or showing great interest