The British generals were usually better leaders, especially early in the war. There was plenty of bumbling and incompetency on both sides.
Washington's actions after the successful siege of Boston - losing battle after battle on Long Island, Manhattan, etc. - showed him to be a very ineffective leader for that terrible first year of the war. He learned and made great progress in leadership after those defeats.
I think not. If we had lost, then
Colonist
Generals
It was the Colonist V.S. the British Soldiers. It was the Colonist V.S. the British Soldiers.
The British were more experienced, had a better army and navy, and were the most dominant in the world
The British generals were in contempt of the Germans because they had modern and powerful army.
78 British Generals died and 146 were wounded.
Well the british are !@##$%^@#$%@#$%^
One effect of the new British taxes on colonist were protests.
Winning the Civil War by selecting better generals, and also by keeping the British and French from aiding the Confederates.
Loyalists
british law that allowed to live in colonist homes