0
Yes, because the two sides were very evenly matched for much of World War 1.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What caused the widening of the war?
Because of the stalemate on the Western Front both sides sought to gain new allies who n=might provide a winning advantage.
What was the total cost of the world war ll for both sides?
£130 090
What was the total cost of World War 2 for both sides was over?
$1 trillion (:
How many people died during World War 1 on both sides?
about 7-10 million people died in world war one
What impact did the battle have on the world War?
Apart from causing hundreds of thousanmds of deaths on both sides it failed to acheive its objectice of closing the Dardenelles to German shipping.
What is the World War 1 term used when both sides are not advancing with their troops?
stalemate
What best describes the first few years of world world war 1 both sides were in a?
both sides were locked in a stalement
What is it called when both sides are tied in a war?
Stalemate; stand-off.
How did both parties react to the presidential election results in 1876?
Refused to back down and were locked in stalemate
Why is World War 1 famous for trench warfare?
Because there is something called a Stalemate. Both sides cannot advance so they dug trenches and stayed there.
Stalemate cold war term?
No, stalemate is a chess term, meaning an end with no winner. As long as the Cold War lasted and both sides were still able to one-up each other, it was not a stalemate.
Is a public pool allowed to be locked from both sides?
No
Why did they use tanks in World War 1?
In 1917 both sides had been locked in a stalemate and fighting, the British invented the tank to penetrate German lines and end the stalement, they also used tanks because mass infrantry charges were not working because of the new maxim guns (Machine Guns).
What caused the widening of world war 1?
Because of the stalemate on the Western Front both sides sought to gain new allies who n=might provide a winning advantage.
What is the reason for the stalemate during world war 1?
Both sides were too equal. Neither side could gain over the other, as the fighting went back and forth, often over the same area. This resulted in both sides settling for a relatively static trench warfare.
What type of fighting developed among the western front in world war 1 causing both sides to be locked in year for an end?
War of attrition
Why were there trenches in the first place?
I assume the question is about the trenches used in World War I? Both sides of the conflict reached a stalemate and dug protective trenches. The number of soldiers killed and maimed (on both sides) was tremendous and proved the futility and waste of warfare, as frontal attacks moved the front back and forth.
