Tactical: Poor tanks (armament and armor) - poor airplanes (initially) - tank destroyers - defective torpedoes - lack of light MG - poor anti-tank weapons
USSR
Strategic: - Unskilled generals, timid - officer corps decimated by purges - political operatives co-leading military units - poor overall strategy (straight ahead mass attack) - disregard for life
Tactical: poor airplanes (initially) - poor low level leadership (initially) - poor troop training - disregard for troop welfare - shortage of arms (initially) - uneducated troops
UK
Strategic: Extremely timid generals(early in war) - class bound officer corps - small army(early in war) - Small airforce (early in war)- Last war thinking(early in war) - Forces spread out all over the globe - dependence on imports along extended supply lines, Tactical: poor tanks(early in war)
AnswerNot at all, they were strong enough to win. AnswerI agree with the last answer. The Allied Forces had a substantial role in defeating Hitler and the German Empire, along with the other countries like the Red Army.The French army was much larger than the Germans and they had some very good tanks. There tactics were the pitts and they got there butts kicked.The Russian army was the largest in the wotld
Britain, USA and Canada were the main allies.
No.
no
they sent supplies to their team (the allies)
China was with the allies as it had been invaded by Japan.
The Netherlands were Allies in World War II.
America helped it's allies during World War 2 by shooting people and stuff. they were smart.
Norway's allies were Britain, and the allies including the U.S.
Britan was one of New Zealand's allies in world war 2.
During World War 1, Norway was a neautral country. During World War 2, Norway was a part of the Allies.
Russia
the allies
The Allies .
allies
Spain was not involved in World War 2. They were neutral
Britain, USA and Canada were the main allies.
the soviet union (Russia)