No all the battles where east of the Mississippi River execpt Texas there was a battle in Texas
Yes, there were naval battles; in fact, the first ironclad ships were invented during the Civil War.
The simple answer is no. Idaho became a territory in 1863 so it wasn't even a state. The only state in the west at the time was California and it was a member of the Union. The Idaho Territory did not have any Civil War battles in it. At the time of the Civil War there were battles with the indigenous populations, those being the Shoshone and Bannock. The Shoshone were typically found in lands towards Utah while the Bannock were at Fort Hall (near Pocatello). Hope this helps.
During the US Civil War, the State of Kentucky was the site of several battles between the North and the South.
no
No
Yes. There were battles in the Civil War where union forces were outnumbered. When we study the battles in school, we generally stick to the major ones. There were many others. In a number of those, there were more confederates than Union solders.
no
no but the Sioux uprising of 1862 in Minnesota is considered part of the Civil war,and had several battles.
wasn't aware that any general surrendered in Norfolk during the civil war, as no battles were fought in the county
yes
No Civil War battles of consecuence were fought in California.
The Battles of Brandwine and Fort McHenry in the Revolutionary War and the Battle of Antietam in the US Civil War.