The wealthier Romans were able to afford the more luxurious fabrics for their clothing. For example, the wealthy could have soft fine wool for his tunics, while the poorer person had to settle for the coarser, maybe itchier wool. The wealthy could afford silks and linens and in the later part of the empire, cotton, while these fabrics were out of reach of the poor. The rich women could (and did) embellish their clothing with jewelry, while the poor woman was lucky if she had a cheap jeweled hairpin. The leather for a wealthy person's footwear was tanned and of a better quality than a poor person's and the wealthy could easily afford to have the fabrics for their clothing dyed with the more expensive dyes which could give them colors anywhere from pale pastels to the deep, almost iridescent purplish red the Roman senators wore. The poor, were mostly confined to the red and yellow dyes and mixtures of the colors they could produce because red and yellow were the cheapest dyes.
Well a Roman soldier was a farmer and owned a land. I think, you would put them into poor "group".
Hope that helps :)
Romans We're both Rich and poor but it depended on how long you have been there really.
The Patrician were the Upper Class.
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
Money. The wealthy had the financial means to live a more lavish lifestyle than the poor. In addition, if a person were wealthy enough, he could try to enter politics, in particular if he were of the patrician or plebeian class.
It was hard for poor people because they didnt have the proper care that the wealthy people needed.
Poor people got free bread and shows and wealthy people lived in town or on large farming estates. Many of these wealthy people had once lived in Rome.
No, quite the opposite actually. The patrician, by definition, is a wealthy land owner in ancient Rome.
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
It was hard for poor people because they didnt have the proper care that the wealthy people needed.
Money. The wealthy had the financial means to live a more lavish lifestyle than the poor. In addition, if a person were wealthy enough, he could try to enter politics, in particular if he were of the patrician or plebeian class.
Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.
In Rome there were extremely wealthy people and people of middling income. Most people were poor and unemployed or underemployed and relied on a free grain dole distributed by the state.
its sorta 70 30 with more richpeople than poor people
I'm guessing both but id go with wealthy although poor people at my school go for every sport.
??? of course, although there are a great many more poor people
Greece has both wealthy people and poor people. But many are middle class.
It depends on the country, and how poor they are. Often they dress similarly to more wealthy people, but with less expensive fabrics.
wealthy people should help poor people.
Poor people got free bread and shows and wealthy people lived in town or on large farming estates. Many of these wealthy people had once lived in Rome.