Want this question answered?
Reconstruction-
After the Civil War ended, one of the main focuses was presidential reconstruction, which created a stronger government to unify the north and south. With reconstruction in place, the South wanted to do it's best to restore order. The closest Congress would allow them to get to that was the intro of black codes(designed to ensure blacks remained second class)
The Presidential opposition and Southern States resistance to the Fourteenth Amendment and to Reconstruction so outraged the Congress that in March 1867 it passed a Reconstruction Act that imposed its desired version on the South by means of a diktat. Therefore all former Confederate States but one (Tennessee had been readmitted in 1866 to the Union), were grouped into five military districts, each ruled by a military governor in order to push forward the Reconstruction program according to the Congress wishes and check the progress done.
An important difference between congressional Reconstruction and presidential Reconstruction is the level of power and authority given to the federal government. Congressional Reconstruction, led by Radical Republicans, sought to assert strong federal control over the South to protect the rights of newly freed African Americans. In contrast, presidential Reconstruction, led by President Andrew Johnson, favored a more lenient approach with the states having greater control over their own affairs and offering amnesty to former Confederates.
passage of the Reconstruction Acts
Radical Republican
Congressional Reconstruction restricted eligibility for participation in the state constitutional conventions in the South. Presidential Reconstruction was run by the president. The president who at the time was Abraham Licoln made it up. When he died Johnson took over the plan. Congress lost hope in him so they tried to impeach him. They also in turn took over and named there plan Congressional reconstruction. Therefore Congress made Congresional Reconstruction and The president made presidential reconstruction. The presidential reconstruction supported the 10% rule, while the congressional reconstruction rejected the rule, instead they supported the"forfeited-rights theory"which states that as long as the southerners rebelled against the union; they had forfeited their rights under the U.S. constitution.. Also the presidential rule was very lenient towards the southerners. and offered some form of amnesty to southerners who would take oath of allegiance. the congressional reconstruction wanted revenge against the south.
here's a blurb i found when trying to answer this same question for my homework:Radical Reconstruction, also known as Congressional Reconstruction, was the time when congressional Republicans, moderates and Radicals, controlled Reconstruction in the South. Prior to Republican control, Andrew Johnson's Presidential Reconstruction had allowed ex-Confederate leaders to regain power in southern state governments. He lost control over Reconstruction when congressional elections in the fall of 1866 led to a two-thirds majority of Republicans in both houses of Congress. When the Fortieth Congress returned in March 1867, presidential Reconstruction ended.Hope that helped you!!
National Congress for Timorese Reconstruction was created in 2007-03.
reconstruction
the year !
Congress, as a whole does not vote on presidential appointments. It is only the Senate that must give its advice and consent to presidential appointments.
congress has overruled a presidential veto about 200 times
RECONSTRUCTION
1988
Reconstruction-
as the presidents responsibility