The Three-Fifths Compromise
Three fifts compromise
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
The issue of the Three-Fifths Compromise was resolved at the Constitutional Convention, which determined how slaves would be counted for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise stated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
Under the 3/5ths Compromise, each enslaved person was counted as three fifths of a free person for population reasons. This was especially true when it came to determining taxation and legislative representation for slave holding states.
William Blount believed that slaves should be counted as part of the population for the purpose of determining representation in Congress and for the allocation of taxes. He supported the Three-Fifths Compromise, where slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, outlined in the United States Constitution, determined that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of representation in Congress. Additionally, the Constitution included a provision that prohibited Congress from banning the transatlantic slave trade until 1808.
The question was, how should slaves be counted for the purpose of Congressional representation? The South wanted to count all slaves as "population", because this would increase the number of Representatives from the slave states. The northern states didn't want to include slaves AT ALL; if they weren't fully citizens and couldn't vote, why should they be counted for purposes of representation? The "three fifths" compromise gave southern states some additional Congressional representation, without giving the South an overwhelming advantage.
The system used to count slaves for representation in Congress was the Three-Fifths Compromise. Established during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, it stipulated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person when apportioning representation and taxation among the states. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of slaveholding states with those of free states in the legislative process.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was created by the Constitutional Convention in 1787 to address the issue of how slaves would be counted for the purpose of determining a state's representation in Congress and its electoral votes. The compromise counted each slave as three-fifths of a person for these purposes, giving southern states more representation despite a significant portion of their population being unable to vote or hold office.
The 3/5ths compromise was significant because it help benefit the south with more representation in voting. It counted 3/5ths of all slaves which gave the south more votes because slaves were more abundant .This had to do with counting population for the purpose of legal representation in Congress. The issue was weather or not to count slaves. Some wanted to count them and some didn't. They worked it out with a compromise. The slaves were counted but they only counted as three fifths each. That way nobody got what they wanted. It was not a good solution but it was something they were able to agree upon at the time. I hope this helps.
To settle the 1876 presidential election