A parable is a short descriptive story whose purpose is to illustrate a belief or a moral. Parables are often written in prose or verse, and have human characters.
An allegory is a descriptive story that is used to convey a particular moral or belief indirectly, typically through symbolism and figurative language. It aims to teach a lesson or highlight a universal truth through the narrative of characters or events. Examples include Aesop's fables and Plato's "Allegory of the Cave."
Type your answer here... parable
cautionary tale
A parable is a short, descriptive story that is used to describe a particular moral or proverb.
They are known as a fables, as in Aesop's Fables.
Moral decay is loosely defined as the decline in morals. It can be used to describe a particular area, but is generally used when talking about a specific country.
A moral value is a belief or principle that guides an individual's behavior and decision-making, based on what is considered right or wrong within a particular society or culture. Moral values often influence how a person treats others and shapes their sense of integrity and social responsibility.
The right to life is a moral principle based on the belief that a human being has the right to live and, in particular, should not be killed by another human being.
------> Parable!The question's first clause implied a choice that's not presented, but I'd also suggest a Fable. E.g. those by Aesop.
Moral relativism is the belief that correct moral principles are those accepted by the correct religion. Moral relativism is one of many philosophical positions that talks about the differences in moral judgments in different cultures.
Moral Idealism is a belief that individual rights and responsibilities are universal, regardless of outcome.
a moral belief is when someone believes something and other people believe it too.
Descriptive relativism examines, through factual accounts, a plethora of conflicting values without attempting to reach a definitive conclusion on morality. For example a descriptive relativist might research the practice of cannibalism to the accepted abhorrence of it in certain cultures. The relativist accepts that no factual account of peoples differing moral views will lead to a definitive moral conclusion, the relavtivist might adopt a personal viewpoint in the process though. For example that certain moral values are primitive compared to others and that we should therefore encourage the former in advancing their moral standard or that there are a wide variety of moral values and that there are no absolute values. In contrast to this Normative relativism advocates that that different moral outlooks are appropriate in their own time. Moral values here a considered as cultural prefrences. In the same way that a cultures food and nutrition is developed according to the surroundings and resources, so are moral values. However normative realism leads to unfavourable conclusions such as the non existence of moral progression, a case of genetic fallacy and a plethora of assumptions such as the unified and uniform moral opinions of every individual in a society at a given time. So the distinction between normative and descriptive relativism is that normative realism provides one conclusion which although difinative, presents it with multiple issues. Descriptive relativism doenst prescribe any particular conclusion but leaves morality as an open question.
An ahura is a member of the ahuric triad in the belief of Zoroastrianism - who regulate the physical and moral order of the belief.
Ethics is just another word for "a set of moral principles". People of all religions and none have ethics. Ethics doesn't require a belief in any particular form of spirituality.