0
What Did Historians Use To determine the reliability of only one manuscript?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Compare and contrast the Northern and Mediterranean Renaissance?
No need, it was the same thing. Historians are only now splitting them for 'the want of something to do', in my opinion.
How have recent historians changed the way people view history?
Historians of today and those of the past base their writings on many factors, one unfortunately is a bias they may or may not be aware of. One thing is a certainty, all historians have a cultural background that differs in many ways from one another. Clearly there will be different views of various past events depending on a variety of factors. Historians of today's Russia will have different views of the history of the Soviet Union, depending upon their political bias or lack of them. The ordinary person, one without a political or cultural bias will now as in the past, believe the "history" that best suits themselves. Of course, there is no consensus of how people of any particular period of time, viewed history. There are too many variables, too many different peoples, too many different time periods. What is clear today as it has always been, historians have written different versions of the same periods of time and events. There can be no proven way to determine if recent historians have changed the way people view history. This is true if only based on intellectual thought. There can be no "proof" for lack of a better term that anything has changed because the historians of today have the same views, accurate or inaccurate today as in the past. Any historian or student of history will agree to that,.
What was the name of the empire founded by Charlemagne?
He founded what historians call the Carolingian empire. Some people rather loosely refer to it as the Holy Roman Empire. It called itself the Empire of the Romans, which was confusing because it was not the only country of the time to do so.
Why do historians refer to Augustus reign as the principate?
Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".Historians refer to the reign of Augustus, and all other imperial reigns for that matter, as the principate because it is an accurate description of the form of government. They don't refer to it as the "empire" as Rome was already an empire for at least 200 years before Augustus. The term principate, comes from the only title Augustus took for himself which was "princeps" meaning "first citizen".
Were the benadictine monks the most popular in the dark ages?
The term "Dark Ages" is no longer used among historians; the period is today known as the Saxon/Viking era.During this time the Benedictine Order was the only order of monks in western Europe, so popular or not, that's all there was.
What are the rituals of the Illuminati?
There are none now, and only a very select few experts of Age of Enlightenment historians could even say with any degree of reliability. The group has not existed for over 200 years.
How is software reliability related to hardware reliability and failure intensity?
why readabilities only for hardware not software
What is the antonym for manuscript?
I think it would be cursive because manuscript is when you type in print so the only other way of writing would be cursive.
What is inter-reliability?
Inter-reliability refers to the consistency and agreement between multiple raters or observers when assessing the same phenomenon. It is used to determine the degree to which different individuals or systems produce similar results when measuring the same thing, helping to ensure the validity and reliability of data collected or interpretations made.
What is a challenging sentence using the word manuscript?
The author painstakingly revised his manuscript multiple times, only to have it rejected by every publisher he submitted it to.
Describe a time when you demonstrated your reliability or integrity at work?
Only you can do this.
What does anopisthograph?
nouna manuscript, parchment, or book having writing on only one side of the leaves.
What were the only two foods historians are certain were on the menu?
Wildfowl and corn are the only two foods that historians are certain were on the menu at the first Harvest.
What does reliability mean in terms of accounting?
Reliability is a basic accounting principle, known also as the objectivity principle. The principle means that only transactions that can be verified will be entered into a company's books.
What are the different causes of war and what percentage can be given to each category?
Sorry, it is not likely that there is any way to answer this question. No two historians will ever agree regarding the root causes of any war, and no war has only one cause. There really are countless reason for the wars of history, and no way to put a percentage to them with any degree of reliability.
What is the verb in the sentence there are only two authenticated copies of this manuscript?
The verb in the sentence is "are." It is a form of the verb "to be" indicating the existence or presence of something.
How do you determine the radius if you only have the diameter?
to determine the radius if you only have the diameter, you divided the diameter by 2. then there you have it ! you have the radius !
