0
What Roman Emperor that turned the government into dictatorship?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a Dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Your question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoYour question can be answered in two extremes: none of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship, and all of the emperors turned the government into a dictatorship. A dictatorship was a political office under the republic form of government, with one man having supreme power. The principate or "empire" replaced the republican government. So when the emperors came into power, they were a one man rule, which in effect was the same as a dictatorship.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who is Roman Emperor during the Carthage war with the Romans?
There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.There was no Roman emperor during the war with Carthage. At that time the Roman government was the republic.
Did the Romans revolt against dictatorship?
No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.
Which Roman Empire died in 44 BC?
There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.
The roman republic provided a model for the US government in what way does the US government differ from the roman republic?
Temporary dictatorship
What religion was the Roman Emperor Nero?
The Roman Emperor Nero was raised in the Roman pagan religion, but he eventually turned against it and persecuted Christians in the Roman Empire.
What was pompeiis government?
The Roman Emperor at the time.
Which form of government would the plebeian be more likely to support A Roman republic or a dictatorship under Julius Caesar Why?
They no longer had wanted a republic, They Had A Dictatorship....Senators wanted so much power and influence in the Empire. The emperor had all the political power and also the army was completely loyal with him....
Who was the greatest roman emporer?
Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.Your question can only be answered by an opinion and here's mine. Augustus was, to my mind, the greatest Roman emperor because he smoothly turned the government from the republic to the principate, rebuilt the city of Rome, initiated a period of almost 200 years of peace and prosperity, and was the longest ruling emperor.
Who was the roman emperor in 265 BC?
george bush III There was no Roman emperor in 265 BC. Rome had a republican form of government at that time.
How was the government of the Roman republic different from the government from the government of the Roman Empire?
The difference is really between the Roman republic and the absolute rule by emperors which followed the republic. Rome already had an empire under the republic. Much of her imperial expansion occurred during the period of of the Republic. The republic had five types of elected officers of state. Augustus (the first Roman emperor) turned them into his appointees. The powers of the popular assemblies which elected the officers was transferred to the senate and their role became merely ceremonial. The senate was emasculated and turned into an instrument for the emperor's power. The plebeian institutions, the plebeian tribunes and the Plebeian Council were done away with. Augustus created a bureaucracy under the control of the emperor. The army was also bought under the control of the emperor who was an absolute ruler.
What role did the Roman Emperor play in the government of classical rome?
The Roman Emperors were absolute rulers.
Why did Justinian wanted his empire to be like the roman empire?
Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.
