answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Gaius Marius introduced the Marian reforms of the army of 107 BC. Recruitment was opened up to the poor and soldiers were given a sixteen-year career (later this was increased to 20 and 25 years). The poor flocked to the army because it gave them a career, a pay and a pension in the form of either a sizeable lump sum (numnaria misso) or a plot of land to farm (agrarian missio). This made the soldiers loyal to their military commanders, but not necessarily to the senate. Julius Caesar found it easy to levy legions using his private funds, first for his Gallic Wars and then for his fight against the forces of the senate which historians have called Caesar's Civil War. The soldiers who fought for the senate did so because their commanders supported the senate. At the beginning of his career, Augustus also levied a military force by using his personal funds

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What Roman general began the new military recruitment system that made soldiers loyal to their general and to the Senate?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

In the Greek government retired soldiers were given automatic seats in the Senate?

Not automatically. The soldiers, just like every other free citizen (In Athens), had to be elected into senate.


Why would the Senators feel threatened by Roman generals In Rome?

It was during thew period of the late Republic, after the Marian reforms of the army, that Roman military commanders could be a threat to the senate. Prior to the reforms, the Roman army was a part-time militia of drafted peasant farmers. The soldiers were levied for the military campaigning season and then went back to their farms. There was a property threshold to join the army because the soldiers had to procure and pay for their military equipment themselves. Gaius Marius abolished the property threshold, made joining the army voluntary and provided that the soldiers were to receive their military equipment for free. After 16 years of service they were to be given the grant of a plot of land to farm. The landless poor flocked to the army, which they saw as an institution which would take care of them, and give them a pay and a sort of person. However, a centralised system of recruitment was not established and soldiers were often recruited and paid by the military commanders. This made them loyal to their commanders. Soldiers were recruited by commanders involved in civil wars. They loyalty of soldiers could be used by their commanders to obtain what they wanted. . An example of this was in 71 BC Crassus and Pompey camped their troops outside Rome to put pressure have themselves elected as consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic). Pompey was not even eligible on the grounds of being below the required age and of not having served some public offices which were required before the consulship.During the military anarchy of the crisis of the 3rd century it was the emperors who were threatened by military commanders. There were commanders who were hailed as emperors by their own troops and deposed the incumbent emperor. During the period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and the senate had little power.


How did the changing role of the army contribute to the roman republic end?

To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.


What is the Age to be elected to the general assembly for house and senate?

25


Who was in charge of the military in the roman republic?

In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.

Related questions

What is Military powers senate?

the world


In the Greek government retired soldiers were given automatic seats in the Senate?

Not automatically. The soldiers, just like every other free citizen (In Athens), had to be elected into senate.


What is the role of the military in the senate?

the military doesnt have a role. hope this answers your question.


What are two branches of the Illinois general assembly?

The Illinois General Assembly is comprised of the Illinois House of Representatives and the Illinois Senate. The State Senate has 59 members and the House has 118 members.


What are the two houses of the general assembly?

The senators and the house of delegates are the 2 parts of the general assembly.


Why were the Roman senators feel threatened by Roman generals?

It was during thew period of the late Republic, after the Marian reforms of the army, that Roman military commanders could be a threat to the senate. Prior to the reforms, the Roman army was a part-time militia of drafted peasant farmers. The soldiers were levied for the military campaigning season and then went back to their farms. There was a property threshold to join the army because the soldiers had to procure and pay for their military equipment themselves. Gaius Marius abolished the property threshold, made joining the army voluntary and provided that the soldiers were to receive their military equipment for free. After 16 years of service they were to be given the grant of a plot of land to farm. The landless poor flocked to the army, which they saw as an institution which would take care of them, and give them a pay and a sort of person. However, a centralised system of recruitment was not established and soldiers were often recruited and paid by the military commanders. This made them loyal to their commanders. Soldiers were recruited by commanders involved in civil wars. They loyalty of soldiers could be used by their commanders to obtain what they wanted. . An example of this was in 71 BC Crassus and Pompey camped their troops outside Rome to put pressure have themselves elected as consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic). Pompey was not even eligible on the grounds of being below the required age and of not having served some public offices which were required before the consulship. During the military anarchy of the crisis of the 3rd century it was the emperors who were threatened by military commanders. There were commanders who were hailed as emperors by their own troops and deposed the incumbent emperor. During the period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and the senate had little power.


Why would the Senators feel threatened by Roman generals In Rome?

It was during thew period of the late Republic, after the Marian reforms of the army, that Roman military commanders could be a threat to the senate. Prior to the reforms, the Roman army was a part-time militia of drafted peasant farmers. The soldiers were levied for the military campaigning season and then went back to their farms. There was a property threshold to join the army because the soldiers had to procure and pay for their military equipment themselves. Gaius Marius abolished the property threshold, made joining the army voluntary and provided that the soldiers were to receive their military equipment for free. After 16 years of service they were to be given the grant of a plot of land to farm. The landless poor flocked to the army, which they saw as an institution which would take care of them, and give them a pay and a sort of person. However, a centralised system of recruitment was not established and soldiers were often recruited and paid by the military commanders. This made them loyal to their commanders. Soldiers were recruited by commanders involved in civil wars. They loyalty of soldiers could be used by their commanders to obtain what they wanted. . An example of this was in 71 BC Crassus and Pompey camped their troops outside Rome to put pressure have themselves elected as consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic). Pompey was not even eligible on the grounds of being below the required age and of not having served some public offices which were required before the consulship.During the military anarchy of the crisis of the 3rd century it was the emperors who were threatened by military commanders. There were commanders who were hailed as emperors by their own troops and deposed the incumbent emperor. During the period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and the senate had little power.


What were Educational Hearings on Vietnam about?

they were informing the senate on military strategy.


How did the changing role of the army contribute to the roman republic end?

To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.To understand how the army contributed to the end of the republic, you have to understand the military system. There was no central army as we know it today. Each legion swore their oath of loyalty to their legate or general. The senate would commission a general to lead legions, but the legions themselves were not under the control of the senate, they were under oath to their general. Ambitious generals could command their armies to rebel and perhaps begin a civil war. Julius Caesar is a prime example when he started the civil war against Pompey and the senate which brought down the republic in all but name. This situation was not remedied until the reign of Augustus.


why does the governor general open parliament in the senate chamber?

not to allow the senate to speak until tax meeting


Who chose Attorney General Roland Burris as Obama's successor to the Senate if Blagojevich is under arrest?

Senate


Which body of the general assembly is elected by the people?

The lower chamber, known as the House of Representatives or a similar name, is typically elected by the people in a general assembly. The exact name and structure may vary between different countries or states.