0
The Stamp Act of 1765 was argued to be a tax without representation since the British colonies had no representatives in the British Parliament.
What else can I help you with?
What British Act did colonists argue was a form of taxation without representation?
The Stamp Act of 1765 was argued to be a tax without representation since the British colonies had no representatives in the British Parliament.
Why were colonist so upset about no taxation without representation?
Because England was bleeding them dry and they didn't have anyone in the English government standing up for them. England was taking all of their money and had no one in the government representing the colonists. No one was able to argue their side.
Which act of Parliament caused the colonists to argue that the British had violated the principle of taxation without representation?
the stamp act
Which act of the parliament caused the colonists to argue that the British had violated the principle of taxation with representation?
the stamp act
Did James Otis argue that the colonists should not be taxed by parliament?
Yes, James Otis argued that the colonists should not be taxed by Parliament without their consent. He famously stated that "taxation without representation is tyranny," emphasizing that the colonists, lacking direct representation in Parliament, should not be subjected to British taxes. His arguments helped galvanize colonial opposition to British taxation and contributed to the growing sentiment for independence.
What was a result of the Stamp Act crisis the prime issue for Americans shifted to the question of?
The Stamp Act crisis shifted the primary issue for Americans from mere taxation to broader questions of representation and governance. Colonists began to argue that they should not be taxed by a Parliament in which they had no representation, encapsulated in the slogan "No taxation without representation." This crisis fostered a growing sense of unity among the colonies and laid the groundwork for future resistance against British rule, ultimately leading to the American Revolution.
Why did some northern delegates argue that enslaved people should be counted for taxation but not representation?
Northern states objected because enslaved people were legally considered property. So, some argued that as property, Slaves should be counted for taxation but not representations.
What did Henry ii and becket argue about?
Taxation of the church.
Defenders of the electoral college argue that?
They argue that it maintains a federal system of government and representation.
How do you argue in a more sophisticated manner?
You argue coolly, without vehemence .
What did Patrick Henry argue that the colonists must do?
Patric Henry argue that the colonist must do is they have to hard work
How did England use virtual representation as an excuse for denying colonials representation in Parliament?
England used the concept of virtual representation to argue that the interests of the American colonists were adequately represented in Parliament, even though they did not have direct representatives. This theory posited that all members of Parliament represented the entire empire, including the colonies, regardless of whether colonists could vote for them. Consequently, the British government believed that it was justified in imposing taxes and laws on the colonies without their consent, claiming that their needs were considered through this broader representation. This rationale ultimately fueled colonial discontent and the demand for direct representation.
