Want this question answered?
Apartheid was not a pleasant thing, but in reality was little different from the segregation practiced in the US southern states at the same time.
No! because their so caught up in making us pay taxes sko they can get rich and leave us on the streets!
The western US was secured by the US Army from 1865 (the end of the US Civil War, when westward movement began in ernest) until the official end of the Indian Wars (Frontier Wars) at the Battle of Wounded Knee in 1890.
CIS 150 eh?
They retaliated, this was the start of WWII
Not at all. If you are looking for a comparison with apartheid; you could look at the US treatment of Orientals from the end of the ninteenth century. If you are looking for a comparison to the Holocaust of WW2 Germany, you could look at the US treatment of Native Americans from the 17th century into the 20th century.
Apartheid was not a pleasant thing, but in reality was little different from the segregation practiced in the US southern states at the same time.
go to school
Nightly Business Report
In the US, the word is segregation; in South Africa the word is apartheid. In all countries it's discrimination.
The United States wasn't at war with Japan in WW1.
Both major Naval engagements were decisive and total US victories.
South Africans were under apartheid (note that apart is right in the word), which is a separation/segregation of blacks and Whites. The US did not like that, so we told them we will not trade with them until the apartheid is over.
they have been bombing the sh!t of of them stilllllllllllllll
No! because their so caught up in making us pay taxes sko they can get rich and leave us on the streets!
congress got screwed in the long run
that communists would take over the us government. (apex)