answersLogoWhite

0

they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted

User Avatar

Isadore Labadie

Lvl 10
4y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?

they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted


Following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?

Secondary sources provide historians with context and analysis that primary sources often lack. They synthesize information from multiple primary sources, allowing historians to gain a broader understanding of events and trends. Additionally, secondary sources can highlight interpretations and perspectives that may not be immediately apparent in primary materials, making it easier for historians to identify patterns and draw conclusions. This comprehensive overview can save time and enhance the depth of historical research.


What describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?

Secondary sources provide historians with analysis, interpretation, and context that primary sources may lack. They synthesize information from multiple primary sources, allowing historians to gain a broader understanding of events and trends. Additionally, secondary sources often incorporate the perspectives of other scholars, which can highlight varying interpretations and debates within the historical narrative. This comprehensive view aids historians in constructing well-rounded arguments and conclusions.


What is one advantage s secondary source has over a primary source?

One advantage of a secondary source over a primary source is that it may provide analysis, interpretation, or synthesis of information from multiple primary sources. This can offer a broader perspective or deeper understanding of a topic compared to individual primary sources.


What is an advantage of secondary sources over primary sources?

Secondary sources are better because your not learning the truth you have some story behind it and possible reasons that came to be.


What is advantage of secondary sources over primary sources?

Secondary sources are better because your not learning the truth you have some story behind it and possible reasons that came to be.


What describes and advantages for secondary sources have over primary sources historians?

They can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted. (APEX)


What is one advantage a secondary source has over a primary source?

A secondary source summarizes complex subjects by synthesizing multiple sources.


Which of the followinf describes the advantages that secondary sources have over primary sources of historians?

Secondary sources offer analysis and interpretation of historical events, providing a broader understanding. They also help to corroborate information found in primary sources, adding context and perspective. Additionally, secondary sources can present differing viewpoints and theories, enriching the historical narrative.


A primary advantage of the electronic ignition system over conventional ignition systems is?

a primary advantage of the electronic ignition system over conventional ignition system is?


What are the evidence of historians?

Historians rely on various forms of evidence to reconstruct and interpret the past, including primary sources like documents, letters, and artifacts created during the time being studied. Secondary sources, such as books and articles that analyze or interpret primary materials, also play a crucial role. Additionally, historians consider oral histories, visual evidence like photographs and paintings, and archaeological findings to provide a comprehensive understanding of historical events and contexts. Together, these forms of evidence help historians build narratives and understand the complexities of human experiences over time.


What advantages do primary sources have over secondary sources?

Primary sources provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence of events, while secondary sources interpret or analyze information provided by primary sources. Primary sources are often more reliable and can provide unique perspectives that may not be found in secondary sources. They can offer a deeper understanding of historical events or issues.