Well there are many animals that "is can" charge like Triceratops. Just recently, I was charged by a small pack of Chihuahuas. It was quite terrifying. But you also have llamas and emus. Terrible charging creatures.
the triceratops guarded its babies by charging at predators and stomping its foot much like how a bull does when its going to charge
no
Triceratops didn't eat any animal. It was a herbivore.
the rhino
While there is no animal in the fossil record called "Dimetrosaurus", you may be referring to "Dimetrodon", a genus of carnivorous, mammal-like reptile that lived before the dinosaurs had evolved. In terms of physical power, it is likely that Triceratops was the stronger animal, given its size and structure.
None that we know of. The triceratops was believed to be the very last of the large herbivorous dinosaurs. The modern rhino bears some resemblance, but is not even distantly related to triceratops.
Yes, Triceratops were a prey animal. The only predator that could threaten adults, however, was the T-Rex. Triceratops used its horns and potentially lived in herds to protect itself.
as a species 3000 years an an animal 5-8
A 3-horned chameleon, its true. A dinosaur is sortive an animal so triceratops
Triceratops walked on all four legs. Therefor, they were quadrupeds. In the past, Triceratops was often portrayed with a sprawling gait, but research shows that, like other dinosaurs, Triceratops was fully erect.
Rhinoceros is not at all related to Triceratops. Rhinoceros is a mammal, while Triceratops is a dinosaur and thus a reptile. Any similarity between the two is simply superficial.
Triceratops was a quadrupedal land animal. It didn't have wings or fins, and technically the end of the forelimb is a foot, not a hand, unless the animal is at least partly bipedal. Its front feet each had three toes.