An archeologist explores everything.
An archaeologist would most likely explore ancient ruins, burial sites, and artifacts to learn about past civilizations and cultures. They may excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and study historical records to piece together the history of a particular region or time period.
An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.
Archaeologist. <3
Archaeologist
Archaeologist
Which would an archaeologist most likely study? A.Ruins of ancient citiesB.Origins of human beingsC.How plants were domesticatedD.Spread of religions[(A)]
Archaeologist hope that helped! :)
They would explore objects of people and places of the past.
archaeologist
Who would be most likely to examine the remains of clay jars to determine what they once held?
Why a temple was built.
An archaeologist would most likely study artifacts found in ruins as they are trained to uncover, analyze, and interpret material remains from past human societies.