They would explore objects of people and places of the past.
An archeologist explores everything.
An archaeologist would most likely explore ancient ruins, burial sites, and artifacts to learn about past civilizations and cultures. They may excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and study historical records to piece together the history of a particular region or time period.
a psychologist or a cognitive neuroscientist. They would likely explore the functions and purposes of the mind from a scientific or psychological perspective.
An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.
The Atlantic Ocean was the body of water Europeans were most likely to explore last. They were unsure of what lands, if any, lay to the west.
An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.
in most casses a
A packed of seeds
instinct theory
they would most likely have web feet
To explore the moon and take samples, most likely because us humans were curious!
would an apricurist most likely work with apes