They would explore objects of people and places of the past.
An archeologist explores everything.
An archaeologist would most likely explore ancient ruins, burial sites, and artifacts to learn about past civilizations and cultures. They may excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and study historical records to piece together the history of a particular region or time period.
An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.
An archaeologist would be more likely to explore the site of an ancient battle, as their expertise lies in studying material remains to understand past events. They would excavate the site to uncover artifacts, weapons, and other evidence that could provide insights into the battle. Historians, on the other hand, would primarily rely on documented accounts and texts to analyze the battle.
The Atlantic Ocean was the body of water Europeans were most likely to explore last. They were unsure of what lands, if any, lay to the west.
in most casses a
A packed of seeds
instinct theory
To explore the moon and take samples, most likely because us humans were curious!
It depends what planet the spacecraft is travelling to. If it was travelling to Mars, it would most likely be made of high-temperature enduring material. If it was travelling to Pluto, it would most likely be made of low-temperature enduring material.
they would most likely have web feet
well, since you will be with your family most likely, you guys could explore the wonders of incest? just a thought