Want this question answered?
Among myriad others; fossil evidence, artificial selection, biogeographic distribution of organisms and molecular genetics.
The identification of the structure of DNA.
Genetic features, morphological features and behavioural features.
Roughly the same amount of dried soil (kg) was weighted at the start, and five years later. Also, he only gave the plants water, and nothing else.
The discovery of the double helix structure of DNA, (the template for creating genetic offspring cells) was made in 1953 by James D. Watson and Francis Crick.
Climate fossil and fossil climate
List three pieces of evidence that support the idea that the Dust Bowl was “the worst hard time.”
written, visual, oral and i cant remember the other one.
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
observations of the cosmic microwave background that indicate a flat geometry for the universe
There are two main pieces of evidence: Animal and plant species are present on separated continents. The continents fit together like a puzzle.
the difference in the Earth's average density from its expected value
Probably more in the line of many converging pieces of evidence in support of theory. Theory is explanation and fossils are just mineralized bones in the rock. which need and explanation. The fossil record supports the theory of evolution by natural selection and, some say, the theory of punctuated equilibrium.
Three evidence that supports Harry Hess theory of Seafloor Spreading is; 1. Paleomagnetism. 2. Plate Tectonics. 3. Polar Wondering and Polar Reversal.
Scientist use scientific methods to test the new theory. They also examine all the evidence to see if it supports the new theory. Scientist accept a new theory when many test and pieces of evidence support it.
Opinions regarding any field of science may indeed lead to solid scientific evidence or facts. Examples Based on the fossilized remains found at Pompeii, it may become an educated opinion that there are more fossils to be discovered. Hence the opinion may become a scientific fact if more fossils are found. To my knowledge scientific evidence generally does not derive from an uneducated opinion. There are many scientific pieces of evidence that the pyramids in Egypt were built using advanced techniques still unknown to us. The opinion that there is a solution to the question of how the pyramids were built is supported by opinions derived from scientific observations.
Corroborating it with other pieces of evidence