An individual's ascribed status, such as race, gender, or socio-economic background, can influence the opportunities they have for achieving success in society. Factors like discrimination, stereotypes, and access to resources can impact an individual's ability to attain their desired achieved status, as they may face barriers or biases based on their ascribed characteristics. These societal dynamics demonstrate how one's ascribed status can play a significant role in shaping their achieved status.
No, ascribed statuses are based on attributes that are assigned to individuals at birth or are fixed and unchangeable throughout their life. These statuses are typically associated with factors such as race, ethnicity, gender, and social class, rather than talents, abilities, or actions.
Ascribed is what you are doing to get to a specified status. Achieved would mean you have done all required to obtain that status.
The way in which people get own statuses can vary significantly in detail from culture to culture. In all societies, however, they are either achieved or ascribed. Achieved statuses are ones that are acquired by doing something. For instance, someone becomes a criminal by committing a crime. A soldier earns the status of a good warrior by achievements in battle and by being brave. A woman becomes a mother by having a baby. She also can acquire the status of widow by the death of her husband. In contrast, ascribed statuses are the result of being born into a particular family or being born male or female. Being a prince by birth or being the first of four children in a family are ascribed statuses. We do not make a decision to choose them--they are not voluntary statuses. We do not pick the family we are born into nor do we usually select our own gender.Bill Clinton rose from relative poverty to the Presidency of the United States. His life exemplifies the national ideal of a "self-made man". In contrast, his daughter was accorded special treatment while he was in the White House because of her ascribed status as the child of a president.5 (http://anthro.palomar.edu/status/stat_2.htm)Both achieved and ascribed statuses exist in all societies. However, some cultures choose to emphasize the importance of one or the other. In North America today, achieved statuses outside of the family are reinforced while ascribed ones are generally rejected. Children are encouraged from an early age to be independent and self-reliant. They are told to better themselves in life. This can be seen in the admiration of "self-made people" and in the somewhat negative image in the mass media of people who are rich only because they inherited it. This strong cultural bias has led to the enactment of anti-nepotism laws for government jobs. These make it a crime to hire and promote people because they are your relatives. In addition, the North American emphasis on achieved status has led to an acceptance and encouragement of social class mobility and a rejection of gender and ethnicity based restrictions. Children are taught in school from an early age that, despite the fact that they may be from a poor family, male or female, they should aspire to get a good education, better themselves and their family economically, and even become a leader in society.therefore status and roles are two elements of social structre.
Ascribed status is given to individuals at birth or based on factors outside their control, such as race or gender, whereas achieved status is earned through personal actions, accomplishments, or choices. Ascribed status is typically more fixed and can be difficult to change, while achieved status is more fluid and can be influenced by individual efforts.
Social class divides people according to income, education ,and occupational prestige. Each of us receives ascribed statuses at birth; later we add achieved statuses. Our behaviors and orientations are further influenced by the roles we play, the groups to which we belong, and our experiences with social institutions. These components work together to help maintain social order. - Henslin, 2010, pp 97-102 Sociology a down to earth approach.
Social class divides people according to income, education ,and occupational prestige. Each of us receives ascribed statuses at birth; later we add achieved statuses. Our behaviors and orientations are further influenced by the roles we play, the groups to which we belong, and our experiences with social institutions. These components work together to help maintain social order. - Henslin, 2010, pp 97-102 Sociology a down to earth approach.
Some common types of social status include achieved status (based on accomplishments or actions), ascribed status (assigned at birth or through family background), and master status (a primary identity that shapes how others see an individual). These statuses can influence an individual's wealth, power, and opportunities within society.
I think it is such a statuses
Ascribed Status: Ascribed status is assigned to an individual without reference to their innate differences or abilities. (Meaning this cannot change for an individual) Achieved Status: Achieved status is determined by an individual's performance or effort. (Meaning this changes for an Individual) -This was a study conducted by Anthropologist Ralph Linton in (1936)
Social stratification can be based on both ascribed status (such as race, gender, and family background) and achieved status (such as education, occupation, and income). Ascribed status is a social position that is given to individuals at birth, with little or no opportunity to change, while achieved status is based on the individual's efforts and abilities. Both types of status can influence a person's position in the social hierarchy.
An example of an ascribed status is being born into a wealthy family. This status is not achieved through personal actions but is assigned at birth based on familial circumstances.