Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening.
Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing.
On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.
Any serious argument against testing on animals. Drugs and diagnostics, toxicity and surgery etc. must be tested on someone.
the arguments of Wagner's theory was there was no explanation of how the continents drifted apart.
they are testing if its real or not <3
Yes they can. But they prefer to use animals because they have the same organs. Brain, lungs, etc.
because in this book he answered many of the arguments people had used against the idea of a moving earth.
Dermatological testing is animal testing. Many brands now are funding into alternative ways of testing products safely, without the harm of animals. Most animals used are rodents or rabbits. -------------------------------------------------------------If the product has the words 'Dermatologically Tested' on the packaging it has been tested on human skin. This however does not necessarily mean the product (or it's ingredients) are automatically 'bunny friendly'.Your best bet is to look for products that clearly state on the packaging that the company do not test on animals or commission animal tests from third parties. PETA have a really handy guide to products that aren't tested on animals. You can also email companies about their testing policies if you're unsure (I've done it in the past) and the ones who have nothing to hide with regard to their testing policies will be happy to give you all the info you need.Incidentally, the EU ban on using animals to test cosmetics and their ingredients came in onto force on March 11th this year (2009), so basically any cosmetics you buy that are manufactured within the EU are 'bunny friendly'. It also means that no product tested outside the EU may be sold within the Union.
If we accept that animals can suffer and that there should be justice in the world, then it is obvious that no one has no right to inflict suffering or illness or disfigurement on any innocent creature.
No one has a moral right to bring suffering on any creature especially for the sake of making money. The testing causes the animals pain, the reason for which escapes the animal because of their lack of intelligence. That does NOT make them increasingly tolerant to pain.
Many cultures think some animals are sacred for example: Egyptians: Cats Hindu/ Indian : Beef and they don't eat anything from the animals either so if something was sacred to us then we wouldn't want things tested on them.
No it says that it is against animal cruelty and is not testing on animals :)
Most cosmetics contain urine so who is being tested?
No, the company does not. Himalaya is highly against all testing of all animals. None of the products has ever or will ever be tested on animals.
Almost all animal rights activists are adamantly against testing drugs on animals.
It is a SIN against humanity.
One argument against is that it involves experimenting with the health and safety of human beings. An argument for is that although effects of drugs on animals may be similar to their effects on humans, some effects may be specific to human beings only. Another is that testing drugs on human beings may result in unexpected negative results for the subjects.
Some people argue that developers should not be involved in testing their own code but all testing should be done by a separate team. Give arguments for and against.
SAFE - Save Animals from Exploitation.
The use of DNA testing can support arguments against the death penalty as it has revealed cases of wrongful convictions, highlighting flaws and errors in the criminal justice system. It underscores the possibility of irreversible mistakes, making the argument that the risk of executing an innocent person is too high. DNA testing has helped exonerate individuals on death row, strengthening the case against capital punishment.