Most cosmetics contain urine so who is being tested?
Animals can die from cosmetic testing as could humans.
No one has a moral right to bring suffering on any creature especially for the sake of making money. The testing causes the animals pain, the reason for which escapes the animal because of their lack of intelligence. That does NOT make them increasingly tolerant to pain.
I am afraid that animal cosmetic testing isn't banned in Canada yet. They are allowed to use animals in medical testing and cosmetic testing, under strict laws that the cosmetics are under a certain policy.
Avon is a company that doesn't test on animals. You can check out this website called http://search.caringconsumer.com and they'll give you all the information you need about cosmetic companies when it comes to cosmetic testing on animals.
There are two kinds of cosmetics testing: testing on animals, and testing on people. The only reason they must test on animals, according to law, is if they have a completely new ingredient that's never been used in anything before. An example: a relatively new foundation contains caffeine. There has never been a cosmetic with caffeine in it, but lots of people drink and eat things containing caffeine so we know it's safe and they don't have to test the new makeup on animals. Testing on people makes for a better product: if people don't like the product--whether it's the smell of it, how it feels when you wear it, the ease of its application, how long it stays on your face, or whatever--it won't reach the market. I was going to say "because it doesn't look good on anyone" but then I remembered: if it doesn't look good, they can sell it at Hot Topic.
up to 6.5 million
i realy dont know but animal testing is bad i know that and so is testing perfume. Look on the back of a hair dye box and see if is says Dermatoligicly tested. That means that it may be tested on animals. its wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is when they test makeup on animals, that might also mean perfume.
Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening. Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing. On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.
Obagi Medical does not test its products on animals. http://www.shopstyle.com/product/system-professional-drugstorecom-skin-care-Obagi--c-serum-10/234368757
Cosmetic testing on animals. it's inhumane and it can kill animals, because their bodies are a lot different than ours.
its testing no one likes tests but hey, you know that ANIMAL testing is wrong? so yes, i they should (unless they're blood tests)