A customer-based SLA is an agreement with a specific customer or customer group covering all the IT services they use. For example, a local authority education department might have a single agreement embracing payroll, school administration, human resources, purchasing, financial management systems, and so on. In some ways, this simplifies the relationship between IT and the customer, putting the customer's perspective to the fore. On the other hand, customer-based SLAs are complex and often difficult to agree and manage. Additionally, customers may be disappointed that the same service levels available to them, for common services such as email, for example, cannot be tailored to their specific needs.
ITIL defines a Service Level Agreement (SLA) as an agreement between an IT service provider and a customer. The SLA describes the IT service, records service level targets, and specifies the responsibilities for the IT service provider and the customer. A single SLA may cover multiple IT services or multiple customers.
Some organizations choose a multi-level SLA approach, where elements of services common to all customers are covered by a corporate-level SLA. Issues relating to a particular customer or customer group, no matter what the service, are then covered by a customer-level SLA and all issues relating to a specific service for the customer or customer group are covered by a service-specific SLA. The SLA for a service must be based on realistic, achievable targets (e.g. for performance and availability), and the achievement of these targets depends on the performance of the internal and external services that underpin the delivery of the main service. Putting it another way, SLAs must reflect the levels of service actually being delivered or that can be delivered. They are about what can be done rather than what we would like to be done. If a customer requires a different level of service, this would normally be dealt with by raising a Service Level Requirement. In order for SLM to be confident about the achievement of its SLA targets, it must have specific agreements with the internal and external providers. These agreements fall into two distinct types: • Underpinning Contracts (UCs) • Operational Level Agreements (OLAs) Both should be negotiated, agreed and in place before a commitment is made to the relevant SLA.
Service Level Agreement (SLA) and Service Level Expectation (SLE) are both agreements that outline the level of service expected between a service provider and a customer. The main difference is that SLA is a formal contract with specific metrics and consequences for not meeting them, while SLE is more of an informal understanding of what is expected without the same level of enforcement.
Service Level Expectations (SLE) are the goals or targets set by a service provider for the level of service they aim to deliver, while Service Level Agreements (SLA) are formal contracts that outline the specific terms and conditions of the service to be provided, including the agreed-upon levels of performance and consequences for not meeting them.
Service level management
ITIL defines a Service Level Agreement (SLA) as an agreement between an IT service provider and a customer. The SLA describes the IT service, records service level targets, and specifies the responsibilities for the IT service provider and the customer. A single SLA may cover multiple IT services or multiple customers.
Some organizations choose a multi-level SLA approach, where elements of services common to all customers are covered by a corporate-level SLA. Issues relating to a particular customer or customer group, no matter what the service, are then covered by a customer-level SLA and all issues relating to a specific service for the customer or customer group are covered by a service-specific SLA. The SLA for a service must be based on realistic, achievable targets (e.g. for performance and availability), and the achievement of these targets depends on the performance of the internal and external services that underpin the delivery of the main service. Putting it another way, SLAs must reflect the levels of service actually being delivered or that can be delivered. They are about what can be done rather than what we would like to be done. If a customer requires a different level of service, this would normally be dealt with by raising a Service Level Requirement. In order for SLM to be confident about the achievement of its SLA targets, it must have specific agreements with the internal and external providers. These agreements fall into two distinct types: • Underpinning Contracts (UCs) • Operational Level Agreements (OLAs) Both should be negotiated, agreed and in place before a commitment is made to the relevant SLA.
Some organizations choose a multi-level SLA approach, where elements of services common to all customers are covered by a corporate-level SLA. Issues relating to a particular customer or customer group, no matter what the service, are then covered by a customer-level SLA and all issues relating to a specific service for the customer or customer group are covered by a service-specific SLA. The SLA for a service must be based on realistic, achievable targets (e.g. for performance and availability), and the achievement of these targets depends on the performance of the internal and external services that underpin the delivery of the main service. Putting it another way, SLAs must reflect the levels of service actually being delivered or that can be delivered. They are about what can be done rather than what we would like to be done. If a customer requires a different level of service, this would normally be dealt with by raising a Service Level Requirement. In order for SLM to be confident about the achievement of its SLA targets, it must have specific agreements with the internal and external providers. These agreements fall into two distinct types: • Underpinning Contracts (UCs) • Operational Level Agreements (OLAs) Both should be negotiated, agreed and in place before a commitment is made to the relevant SLA.
Dinesh Verma has written: 'Supporting service level agreements on IP networks' -- subject(s): Customer services, Computer service industry, Internet industry, Service-level agreements, Technischer Kundendienst, Rechnernetz 'Relative Happiness'
Service Level Agreement (SLA) and Service Level Expectation (SLE) are both agreements that outline the level of service expected between a service provider and a customer. The main difference is that SLA is a formal contract with specific metrics and consequences for not meeting them, while SLE is more of an informal understanding of what is expected without the same level of enforcement.
Zone of indifference is a service level where your customer service is forgettable!
Service Level Expectations (SLE) are the goals or targets set by a service provider for the level of service they aim to deliver, while Service Level Agreements (SLA) are formal contracts that outline the specific terms and conditions of the service to be provided, including the agreed-upon levels of performance and consequences for not meeting them.
An effective service level is one where the customer or client is satisfied. The sales person or customer service rep delivers superior service.
The Customer service level rin a supply chain is a function of several different performance indices.
My level of satisfaction with the keyword "customer service" is 8 out of 10.
Service level management
By providing a guarantee that contracted services will be delivered as per agreement By including penalties if contracted services are not delivered By allowing you to negotiate the highest level a provider can guarantee