Basically he or she would do so based on the assumption that the potential juror would be prejudiced in some manner. For example the person had experienced a similar situation to the one being addressed in the trial.
yes
One ethical obligation of a prosecuting attorney is that they must defend their client to the best of their ability. The other two ethical obligations are to defend their client regardless of their guilt or innocence and to keep all conversation between private.
It is not ethical...that would be considered conflict of interest and the court should nt allow it.
An ethical wall is an environment in which an attorney or a paralegal is isolated from a particular case or client to avoid a conflict of interest or to protect a client's confidences and secrets.
Yes. However, there are some circumstances in which it would not be ethical to do so , such as preparing a will in which the attorney is named as a beneficiary.
only if it involves a client
Morality or ethical principles are difficult to challenge universally as they can vary depending on individual beliefs and cultural norms.
Read : 1. Nix v. Whiteside http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Whiteside 2. http://www.calbar.ca.gov/calbar/html_unclassified/ca84-76.html 3. I don't know the third.
Ethical issues in IT. differ from general ethical issues in a variety of ways. Parker, Swope and Baker note that ethical problems involving computers pose a special challenge, for a number of different reasons. Various ethical issues are:1.Ethical dilemmas2.Plagiarism3.Piracy4.Hacking5.Computer crime6.Viruses7.Ergonomics/health issues8.Job displacement/work pressures imposed on computer professionals9.Digital divide10.Gender
No, they are under direct supervision of the attorney they work for. The attorney is the one that is able to be sanctioned for a paralegal's violation of ethics. -Law Student in MA
Unlikely that any such action would be legal or ethical and an attorney should be consulted.
you person,you should alredy know this.