Wood,thick glass and marble. Rock, minerals, crystals and gems are best but expensive. Oil tanks and gas tanks will ruin it.
I know one lab you can do. You will need blocks and a wobbly table. This lab is kind of mediocre, but it is a good way to learn about earthquake-resistant structures. basically, you build buildings and shake the table. The tall buildings will fall but the low buildings are just slightly harmed.
The earthquake caused devastation all throughout the city, destroying roads, downing power lines, and collapsing buildings.
Yes, a bowl of gelatin can make a good earthquake model because it simulates the movement and behavior of geological layers during seismic activity. The gelatin's ability to deform and flow mimics how the Earth's crust responds to stress and strain. Additionally, adding materials like marbles or small structures can help visualize how buildings might react to shaking during an earthquake. Overall, it's a useful educational tool for demonstrating seismic principles.
Stones for support, hollow cement bricks, reinforced steel frame
The intensity of an earthquake is affected by factors such as the magnitude of the earthquake, the depth at which it occurs, the distance from the epicenter, and the type of rock and soil in the area. The local geology and the construction of buildings can also influence the amount of damage caused by an earthquake.
In the Niigata earthquake in Japan, there was a wide range of styles of structure collapse and survival. On Google there are assembled a good set of photos from various sources. Note particularly the group of medium rise housing. Some blocks are intact, some are structurally sound - apart from lying on their back that is! And some in between. The bridge photos show 'progressive collapse' quite well.
this occurs when the saturated (water and soil mix) ground is shaken by the earthquake and overlying buildings on the area start to sink into the saturated soil. liquefraction thus is when the soil moves quite freely releasing any trapped air = less volume underneath building a good example was the earthquake in Japan, Kyoto (1997?)
Houses can only be made to resist earthquakes. They can only be designed and constructed to permit a minimum amount of damage when a quake hits. A big enough quake will destroy about any structure. It may be possible to build an "earthquake proof" house by making it extremely small and building it out of moderately thick reinforced concrete, welded plate steel or something like that which is both strong and rigid. If an appropriately designed structure was sitting on an appropriate pad (but separate from it), a huge quake would only succeed in moving the house around because it would be too small and strong to "break" under the stress. If such a structure was built, a quake would probably, at most, shear off (or tear off flexible) water, gas and waste water lines while making a mess out of the inside.A structure like the one described would probably be minimally functional and no fun to live in. It may be possible to engineer a "floating" rigid structure out of other materials, but anything on this order would cost a mint. You might always build the whole thing out of rubber and dump the rigid idea. That way when the shaking stops, everything returns to its normal shape. Everything on the inside would be a mess, though. Those (the completely rigid and "unbreakable" structure or the completely "flexible" one) are the two ideas that will withstand a quake. Combining the two will involve trade-offs that will almost certainly defeat the project. Think about this problem and you may come up with other ideas. They are also are made of steel, fiber glass, and woodcarboardstealyour mom's apronshoe laces in stress points
You can use a mass damper There are many ways to make buildings less likely to collapse in an earthquake. Such as using good quality materials and reinforcing the building with steel beams. There are also several advanced techniques for building tall buildings which allow them to move with the earthquake rather than against it. (like a tree swaying in the wind) This technique is used in both Japan and California. Even though there are ways to make buildings withstand much fource, no building can withstand extremely powerful earthquakes. you can use hard materials and make the house a dome shape
Good points of using metals in buildings include their strength, durability, and versatility in design. They are also fire-resistant and recyclable. However, they can be susceptible to corrosion and can be more costly than other building materials.
If you have the right materials and can build good and put things together easily then yes you should be able to build steel buildings by yourself. But on the other hand if your not so strong or good with putting things together it might be a difficult task to build your own steel buildings. If that is the problem then you might need some help from others.
Reinforced concrete is a good choice for building houses in earthquake-prone areas because of its strength and durability. It can withstand the lateral forces generated during an earthquake better than materials like wood or brick. Additionally, using steel reinforcement in the concrete can improve the structure's ability to flex and absorb seismic energy.