logical reasoning
A tautological argument is a type of reasoning where the conclusion is already implied in the premises, making it always true. This differs from other types of logical reasoning where the conclusion is not necessarily guaranteed by the premises and requires further evidence or reasoning to support it.
Logical reasoning was a major concept in Enlightenment thinking.
An informal fallacy in logical reasoning is a mistake in reasoning that occurs due to the content or context of the argument, such as using irrelevant information. A formal fallacy, on the other hand, is a mistake in the logical structure of an argument, such as a flaw in the way the premises lead to the conclusion.
The principle of dichotomy states that every proposition can be either true or false, but not both. It is a fundamental concept in classical logic, where statements are categorized as either being true or false. This principle forms the basis for logical reasoning and analysis.
The antonym for "logical" is "illogical." While "logical" refers to reasoning that is coherent, rational, and based on sound principles, "illogical" describes reasoning that is inconsistent, irrational, or lacking in clear thought. Other related antonyms include "irrational" and "unreasonable."
Sound reasoning is correct, valid, logical, believable reasoning.
a logical fallacy
The left side of your brain controls language and logical reasoning.
ar·gu·ment, A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood: log·i·cal Reasoning or capable of reasoning in a clear and consistent manner. logical argument- a course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating a truth or falsehood; the methodical process of logical reasoning; Thesaurus.By it's definition, it's to separate truth from falsehood or fiction.
People with Logical intelligence are abstract thinkers and are attracted to logic and reasoning. They are good at investigation and scientific processes. They learn best by logic. Logical, consistent in the point of reasoning; as, a logical conclusion. Clear reasoning, versed in the principals of logic. Rational, possessing the faculty of reasoning. That possible all is not what it appears.
Descartes reasoning was based on deriving principles that were then the premise of deductive reasoning. Bacon, on the other hand, used empirical observations that were then used for inductive reasoning.