There are no advantages in the removal of the protection and the sexual pleasure that is available from the removal of the foreskin. Circumcision is a religious an cultural rite and there are in fact no health benefits to be had from it. Even Authority's in the US state this position but are cagey in their wording as there is still a thriving industry in both the medical profession and the market for foreskins.
Circumcision is the removal of the Prepuce or foreskin from the penis. this is largely a religious practice and there are no medical or health advantages in it except in extremely rare circumstances.
THE MICHIGAN CHAPTER OF. THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF CIRCUMCISION INFORMATION RESOURCE CENTERS ...Remember there are no health advantages in having the penis mutilated in this way.
Historically, some segments of the original Refom movement stated that circumcision wasn't necessary. Today, the Reform movement supports male circumcision.
Circumcision is one of them--
Not always, but some people think it is.
Some people think it is.
There are always 2 sides to everything. Some people believe circumcision should be outlawed because it's mutilation and unethical, while others believe it's a health and religious measure.
In some parts of Africa and Asia.
No, circumcision is not a common practice in Laos. In Laotian culture, circumcision is not traditionally part of the customs or religion as it is in some other cultures.
There is some interesting thought on the mental effect that may be caused by the painful trauma and other processes as a result of circumcision, Go to the related link below( Circumcision information) for more information on this subject
Some of them do, and it's not always their fault.
birth, marriage, circumcision