Some cons against war in Iraq are...
1) We have been fighting a POINTLESS war for 8 years
2) It is costing us 5 billion dollars per month or 11 million per hour
3) There were no weapons of mass destruction
4) We are spending money on oil in Iraq, fueling their economy & they are just killing us with our own money.
P.S Wortman is gay
the war that's going on now. it's been going on for at least a year
None. Vietnam was a war against another nation (North Vietnam). Iraq is a police action in which law, order, and stability is trying to be established from withing the country. The US is NOT at war with Iraq.
some cons are that yo mama is so fat
Holocausts are genocides murder). I have heard that there are some going on in some parts of Africa like the Congo.And Iraq too.
The justification for the US going to war with Iraq is slightly open to question and debate. The main reason given was because they believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and they had to be disarmed. Many believe it was simply to remove Saddam Hussein though and some even think it was for reasons of oil.
It might have something to do with the civil war going on in the country.
Japan, Germany, Italy some peace keeping in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Turkish that I know of.
What are some mass destruction weapons in Iraq?
There are no pros or cons. It is a neutral holiday.
There are some terrorists from Iraq. However, most Iraqis are not terrorists, and most terrorists are not from Iraq.
No. While most Republicans have been consistently pro-War, some Libertarians in the Republican Party, like Ron Paul, have been against the War in Iraq from Day 1 and stayed that way.
share pro and cons for hernan cortez