answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Matthew focuses less on the birth of Christ than Luke and moves quickly to the adult life of Christ. Luke is thought to have obtained much of his information from Jesus' mother Mary hence the extra detail. Matthew mentions Mary's conceiving by the power of the Holy Ghost and also includes the angel's appearance to Joseph. Luke includes details of the angel's appearance to Mary instead with the same information about the conception. Luke's extra information contains the visit of the shepherds and the presentation of the baby Jesus at the Temple.

Matthew doesn't give the story about Mary and the angel, but he goes into more detail about Joseph and the angel.

Luke's is more detailed. he talks about Mary and the angel Gabriel, and that they are in Nazarath.

Matthew doesnt talk about the visit to Elizabeth, but Luke does.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
A:Some of the differences between the infancy stories in Matthew and Luke:

The angel

  • In Matthew, the angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph, and only in a dream (Matt 1:20), to reassure Joseph that Mary had not been unfaithful.
  • In Luke, the angel appeared to Mary even before she conceived.

It is not rational for both accounts to be true. When the angel appeared to Mary would have been the time for it to appear to Joseph also. Moreover, it does not make sense for the angel to appear in a dream in one case, but in the flesh in the other.

Travel after the birth of Jesus

  • In Matthew, the young family fled from Bethlehem to Egypt some time soon after the birth of Jesus, out of fear of King Herod (2:14). They did not go to Nazareth until after the death of Herod, and even then because they were warned that it was still too dangerous for them to return to Bethlehem.
  • In Luke, the young family travelled to Jerusalem just a few weeks after the birth of Jesus, then returned peacefully to their home in Nazareth. They returned to Jerusalem each year for the Passover, oblivious to any danger that Matthew's Gospel would imply in doing so.

Many try to rationalise this by saying that the events of Luke occurred first and that the events of Matthew did not occur until perhaps two years later. But this raises the question of what they were doing in Bethlehem after having returned to Nazareth, and why they had a house there on this occasion. It also raises the question of why Matthew's author had to explain that when they turned aside and travelled to Galilee, they found "a city called Nazareth."

The visitors

  • In Matthew, magi came from the east bearing gifts.
  • In Luke, poor shepherds came to worship Jesus, after being told about him by angels.

The author of Matthew knew nothing of Luke's shepherds and their angels; the author of Luke knew nothing of Matthew's magi or the star of Bethlehem.

Home town

  • In Matthew, Bethlehem is the home town of Joseph and Mary. This is shown by their ownership of a house (Matt 2:11) and the fact that they were returning from Egypt to Bethlehem (not Nazareth, as they would if this was their home town) but being warned in a dream, turned aside and travelled to Galilee and there lived in a city called Nazareth (2:22-23).
  • In Luke, Nazareth is the home town of Jospeh and Mary. This results in the disjunction that Joseph travelled to Bethlehem for the census that occurred in 6 CE when Quirinius was governor of Syria, yet Jesus was born during the reign of King Herod who died ten years earlier.

Genealogy

  • In Matthew, Jesus' ancestry goes back through his supposed father Joseph, his grandfather Heli, to the great Zorobabel, son of Salathiel, then David. Salathiel's father was Jechonias, leading via the royal line back to King David.
  • In Luke, Jesus' ancestry goes back through his supposed father Joseph, his grandfather Jacob, to the great Zorobabel, son of Salathiel, then David. Salathiel's father was Neri, leading via a line of commoners back to King David.

Many try to rationalise these differences by saying that Luke's genealogy was that of Mary - in spite of Luke 3:23. The fact is that neither author knew what the other had written.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are some differences between the Infancy stories in Matthew and Luke?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What has the author Margaret O'Hair written?

Margaret O'Hair has written: 'My kitten' -- subject(s): Fiction, Stories in rhyme, Cats, Animals, Infancy 'My kitten' -- subject(s): Fiction, Stories in rhyme, Cats, Animals, Infancy 'Sweet baby feet' -- subject(s): Foot, Stories in rhyme, Babies, Fiction 'My Pup' -- subject(s): Juvenile fiction, Fiction, Animals, Infancy, Dogs, Dogs in fiction, Stories in rhyme, Animals in fiction, Puppies


What are the differences between Matthew's and Luke's passion stories?

Matthew's passion story portrays Jesus as a more stoic figure who willingly accepts his fate, emphasizing his kingship and fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. Luke's passion story, on the other hand, presents Jesus as a compassionate and forgiving figure, highlighting themes of mercy and salvation for all people, not just the chosen.


What are all the stories in the Gospel of Matthew?

there are 28 chapters and 31 different stories.


What is the differences from creation stories and migration stories?

the difference is that a a creation story is what people think and a migration story is almost the same but has some differences


When is Matthew gray gubler going to be on celebrity ghost stories?

2011


What are bionic contact lens uses?

At present their use is limited to fictional stories. Work on 'bionic' implants, of various kinds, is in its infancy buy has nothing to do with the fictional stories you may read or watch.


Do all Hindus believe in Lord Vishnu's stories?

Almost all Hindus believe Lord Vishnu's stories. However, there may be slight differences of opinion between Shaivites and Vaishnavites on the story line. Nevertheless, they both Shaivites and Vaishnavites believe in different versions of Lord Vishnu's stories.


What are the stories that contain a geneaology of Jesus and the events surrounding his conception and birth?

The Gospel of Matthew.


What are the biggest differences between hotels and motels?

A hotel has rooms that are in the interior of the building and with lots of floors. A motel has rooms that open to the outside of the building and is usually three stories tall.


What actors and actresses appeared in The Missing Stories - 2008?

The cast of The Missing Stories - 2008 includes: Matthew Cade as Dave Cindy Jacobs as Zoe


What did Matthew and Luke do?

If you mean Matthew and Luke in the Bible, then their stories are written there and you can read about their lives. They both wrote their own version of Jesus's story, their own gospel.


Why did Matthew and Luke include the miracle stories about Jesus' conception and birth?

A:The conservative explanation for the inclusion of the nativity accounts in Matthew and Luke is that the two evangelists believed them to be true. However, Ian Wilson (Jesus: The Evidence) says the hard reality is that neither the Matthew nor the Luke nativity stories offers sufficient historicity to be accepted as true. Burton L. Mack (Who Wrote the New Testament) says that scholars have frequently remarked on these stories of Jesus' birth and infancy. He says of Matthew's account that it is seen as incredible, implausible, far-fetched fictions that some believe to signal Matthew's naivete with regard to legendary material. It is more likely that the authors realised the need to provide more information about Jesus as a person than provided in Mark's Gospel, from which they copied everything they actually knew about the life and mission of Jesus. The author of Matthew's Gospel wanted to draw parallels between Jesus and Moses, while the author of Luke's gospel wanted to place the life of Jesus in a historical perspective, thus for example introducing (slightly out of chronological context) the census under Quirinius. Both authors wanted to demonstrate that Jesus was born of a virgin and that he was conceived as the Son of God.