Want this question answered?
Whatever Shakespeare's religious opinions were, he kept them to himself. Just as it is today, in some places, expressing your religious opinions could get you in big trouble. Shakespeare was always politically correct in his depiction of religion in his plays, so the plays could get past the censors and so Shakespeare and members of his company were not thrown in jail.
hi it nothing hapend
hi it nothing hapend
Though everyone may hold an opinion there is no specific right to one. In addition some peoples opinions carry more weight and authority.
speaks of you in high regard
It is tempting to write a politically correct answer to that and say that opinions that are offensive to other persons or groups should be less deserving of protection. But the US Supreme Court very wisely has held that freedom of speech also encompasses opinions that others - including the authorities - may not like to hear or see. Why? Because the freedom of only non-offensive and politically correct speech and opinion can be said to exist in Russia and even North Korea. Speech that is only insulting, inciting to violence etcetera may be free, but is also covered by other laws and jurisdiction. So if for instance your expressed opinion is also a defamation of character, the insulted party or parties may sue you for considerable damages.
It depends on your country.In the UK and the majority of Europe, the terms:BlackAfricanBritish-AfricanEuro-AfricanIn other countries such as the United States, it varies. For example, some states in the US consider "coloured" to be politically correct, while other states consider it to be a racist insult.So, there is no 100% politically correct term. Why do you need to describe someone by colour anyway? You don't refer to Caucasian friends as "white" - so why refer to non-Caucasians by the colour of their skin?Most people these days refer to them by their nationality. For example, someone of African decent born and living in the UK is British.
They're not. Many are opinions. Many are correct facts. Some are wrong because the person made an error. and some are wrong because of vandalism (intentional nonsense answers).
The short answer: yes. Some may argue they are not the same, or are at least not "politically correct", that one should use "differently-abled" or other terms that no one can keep up with.
They suck. They're good. There's some opinions on the giants.
Nope!
Skrillex