Scientists want to understand the universe in which we live, and respect honesty and knowledge. Scientists believe that the universe can be described mathematically and that it operates on the basis of natural law rather than on the basis of magic. Scientists value cooperation among scientists, so that knowledge can be shared and will advance more rapidly. Scientists believe that observation of reality takes precedence over traditional belief or established dogma.
bacon
YOUR MOMMYOR YOUR MOMOR YOUR MAMANall of these names have been recently used by the scientists of Uranus. their most common quotes are:'OW''S**T'and best of all'man this is a big one'they are referring to logs
Scientists who contribute to the current body of scientific knowledge and literature come from all races. Working individually and in cooperative teams, scientists test various hypotheses using strict methods and retesting. These scientists are never content to accept the first apparent result, but religiously assess the methods used so they can prevent false results. They re-question, re-assess, re-test, and re-evaluate from all angles and do not accept common beliefs, assumptions, or myths without careful scientific experiments, testing, and proofs that support the hypothesis. Scientists, like genealogists, understand the power of a "negative result", that is, results that disprove or that do not support the hypothesis. Because they rigidly look for the smallest proof that disproves the working hypothesis, scientists are likely the only body of professionals who are willing to discard a working hypothesis based on scientific results even if it means trashing years of work, and creating a new hypothesis that takes into account all positive (supporting) and negative (disproving) results from their previous work.
My opinion is that freedom and funding of scientific research is the most important issue today. It has become a common practice of today's governments to regulate what scientists are allowed to research, with what funding, where their funding comes from, and what results they are allowed to report. Governments have been attempting to control scientific progress and scientific results. Overall this only inhibits the scientific community as a whole and slows down the further development of the human race. This is the most important matter in the scientific community in my opinion, for it can effect every field of science and can happen anywhere in the world.
they valued direct observation
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
All scientists ask questions, and test data
Well first of all, the term "scientists" is a very broad term. But as far as things we all have in common, we all use the scientific method, and there's this idea that scientists are skeptical. To what extent that is true is entirely dependent on the person themselves, but science is more-or-less questioning things and explaining things. And to question things, you kinda have to be a bit skeptical.
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
Politicians follow common belief and not scientific evidence that marijuana is bad for you. This is opposed to what scientific evidence offers.
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
So non-scientists would not be disadvantaged.
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
Common, extensive
Scientists find it easier to use scientific names instead of common names, that way another scientist will no exactly what gender, size, hair/fur color.hi