answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Advantages:

There are many pros for whaling, mainly that whaling, if controlled, can be sustainable, and in fact, have less ecological impact than Western-style farming.

Many people don't think that we will quite happily eat beef, bacon, venison but compare that to the size of a whale. A whale will people for the same amount of 100's of cows being cut up for beef. I bet people are a hundred birds being chopped up to mice, so why don't mice hunt us? That's why Japan is so obsessed with killing them. It's obvious, Japan is after the big money.

Disadvantages:

The cons are that there is only a small population of whales, and numbers are declinging from 3,000 worldwide, but in fact, the main species that are being whales right now, the Minke, is actually growing in population. It is okay to me, if Japan limits how many Minke whaled they kill. AND NOT BABIES! Seriously, just kill adults and no bluewhales, one of many endangered or threatened specimens.

"The IWC (International Whaling Commission) The IWC is the organisation responsible for regulating whaling. It was formed in 1946 to manage sustainable hunting of whales. Now it is responsible for conservation of whales, but it is still an imperfect system reflecting its pro-whaling origins.In 1982 the IWC voted to introduce a Moratorium on Commercial Whaling, to take effect in 1986, however Japan never stopped killing whales (see 'Scientific whaling' below).In fact, more than 25,000 whales have been killed since the Moratorium was supposed to come into force.IWC decisions are based on a vote, and Japan "encourages" small third world countries to join the IWC and vote on their side. Japan is alleged to have handed out more than $400 million in bribes so far.

Japanese 'Scientific Whaling' Japan exploits a loophole in IWC legislation, and has never stopped killing whales despite the Moratorium. They simply assign themselves a permit to undertake 'scientific whaling' (ie. killing whales for the purpose of scientific research) and continue hunting whales as before.This practice has been described as "commercial whaling in disguise" - particularly as the meat ends up for sale in high class Japanese restaurants.Japanese claim to be undertaking research by killing whales. However, most of the data collected by the Japanese 'Scientific whaling' programme is not required for management or conservation of whale stocks and is never published in reputable scientific journals.Many Japanese 'research' objectives are based on unsubstantiated or incorrect scientific assumptions. The few relevant research objectives they have (relating to population makeup etc) can be much better addressed using non-lethal methods (e.g. tagging, DNA profiling, and photo-ID etc), or by analysing a century's worth of commercial catch statistics, plus data from the previous 20 years of Japan's lethal research programme.Most Japanese 'research' objectives are directed towards finding data to support a return to commercial whaling, and/or studies on how to make whaling more efficient.

Whales and whaling Blue whales are the largest, and also the rarest whales. There were once 220,000 Blues in Southern Ocean, reduced to around 500 now (maybe 3000 worldwide) by past overhunting. This represents a reduction to approximately 0.2% of their original Antarctic population (or 1.5% worldwide). Despite being protected since the 1960s, their numbers have not recovered.Minke whales are the commonest of the rorquals ('Great whales') - mainly because they are the smallest so have not been subjected to the same hunting pressure yet (they were not targeted by whalers until the 1970s when larger species became too rare). Recent estimates show there could already be as few as 250,000 Minkes from 3 different sub-species in the Southern Ocean, despite Japanese claims of close to 1 million.The whales Japan hunts are the same ones that migrate past the coasts of NZ and Australia, and breed in the Pacific Islands. In addition to the 'scientific' whaling loophole Japanese whalers defy the Southern Ocean whale sanctuary declared in 1994 by killing them right in the heart of the protected area.A lot of the legitimate science is disputed by Japan which comes up with its own (dubious) figures to justify the supposed sustainability of a continued kill. They also argue it is a cherished cultural tradition for Japanese people to keep killing whales - However a recent Japanese Newspaper poll found only 4% of Japanese regularly eat whale meat.Massive industrial-scale Antarctic whaling 10,000 km from Japan is definitely not a tradition and only began around World War II when whale stocks around Japan were already commercially extinct (unviable for continued hunting). Whales were initially targeted by the Japanese for oil as a source of foreign currency!

Recent Developments Japan initially claimed they were taking only Minke whales, but covert genetic analysis by New Zealand scientists revealed some meat for sale in Japan in the 1990s came from dolphins, and some from endangered species such as Sei, Fin, and Humpback whales.The NZ Conservation Minister said anti-whaling nations struggled to comprehend Japan's rationale for continuing whaling. "There is no financial value in it, there is certainly no science in it, so it has to be a twisted nationalism."Japan continues to demand an end to sanctuaries, and an abolition of the Moratorium to allow a return to commercial hunting. Following Japan's example, Norway and Iceland have also resumed whaling in the Northern Hemisphere in recent years, killing hundreds of Minke whales, along with Fin and Sei whales (both species listed as 'Endangered' i.e. facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future).At the 2006 IWC meeting Japan managed to (buy enough support to) win the vote declaring that the Moratorium on Commercial Whaling is unnecessary and blaming whales for depleting the world's fish stocks.Following this success, Japan announced its plans to expand its whaling effort to kill the following numbers whales per year, beginning in the 2006-07 season:

In the Antarctic: Double their current Minke whale kill to 93550 Humpback whales [the total population estimated to pass through New Zealand waters is only 2000!] (species listed as 'Vulnerable' i.e. facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the medium-term future)up to 50 Fin whales (species listed as 'Endangered' i.e. facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future)

In the North Pacific: 220 Minke whales50 Bryde's whales (species listed as 'Unknown Status' due to lack of data)50 Sei whales (species listed as 'Endangered' ie. facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future)10 sperm whales (species listed as 'Vulnerable' ie. facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the medium-term future)

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Dolphins are intelligent mammals. They teach humans about other mammals and their learning capacity. Humans have studied dolphins because of this for years.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Well, dolphins are nice, and VERY friendly creatures, but I think sometimes they can be kind of scary, because they can flip you off their backs.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

One of the dolphins weakness is that they can get burnt by the sun inside and outside the water

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Pros and cons? Of owning a dolphin? Of animal testing on a dolphin? I think you need to improve your question.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

they are fun!

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

I think dolphins are very cute and make precious noises that you never want to stop listening to!

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are some thoughts and opinions about dolphins?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Do dolphins have moral thoughts?

no


What are sentimentals?

political thoughts or opinions


What does studying this topic mean to you?

Your opinions are your own, personal thoughts - nobody can write them for you!You need to learn how to express your thoughts and opinions effectively, which is why you were given this assignment. WikiAnswers will not write down your opinions for you.


What are some thoughts and feelings about the Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer?

=Please give your opinions on the discussion page.=


What are political sentiments?

political thoughts or opinions


What is the collective noun for opinions?

There is no specific collective noun for opinions, in which case a collective noun that suits the situation is used, for example, a bundle of opinions, an onslaught of opinions, a barrage of opinions, etc.


What do you enjoy best about the company?

Sharing opinions and thoughts...


Can rea duncan sing?

It is your opinion personally. Everyone has different thoughts and opinions. If it is for a project just pick one because no one can give you a bad grade on your personal thoughts and opinions.


How do you spell thoughts and what does it mean?

That is the correct spelling of the word "thoughts". It can mean the subjects you are thinking about (your own mental activity) or your opinions (e.g. your thoughts on a subject).


What does JFK mean in his quotes too often we enjoy the comfort of opinions without the discomfort of thoughts.?

John F. Kennedy's quite concerning the comfort of opinions with the discomfort of thoughts means that everyone is entitled to opinions. However, the expression of that opinion may yield negative results.


Personal essays take as their subject matter?

The thoughts, beliefs, and opinions of the author.


Are dolphins handsome?

Answering this question is all based on opinions. In my opinion I think dolphins are very handsome. I think they are the most majestic animals in God's creation.