0
Any such a statement MIGHT be true, but we can't know for sure. There are lots of unknowns in math and science in general; for a list, check the Wikipedia article on "Unsolved problems in math", "... in physics", "... in chemistry", etc.For example: Goldbach's conjecture states that any positive even number (greater than or equal to 4) can be written as the sum of two prime numbers. This HASN'T BEEN PROVEN YET; it is UNKNOWN whether it is true or not! However, leaving aside weirder assumptions, let's assume for now that it's either true or false. In that case, one of the following two statements is true, but science hasn't been able to prove it yet:
* Goldbach's conjecture is true.
* Goldbach's conjecture is false.
In any case, we don't know which of the two statements is true!
Similarly - if you were looking for more ... spiritual truths, one of the following statements must be true, but it seems that science is not able to prove this, one way or the other:
* There is a single, supreme, God, who created the Universe.
* There is no such thing as a single, supreme, God, who created the Universe.
The situation is similar with the existence of angels, an afterlife, reincarnation, and many other things that some religions believe in. In each case, it hasn't been possible, so far, to prove the issue one way or another - so we have a truth that hasn't been proven, but we don't know which one it is.
What else can I help you with?
Why don't we ban science cause it's just going to prove Christians wrong some day?
Again you prove you're ignorance of the Bible. He will never manifest himself through science, so it will never happen.
What are the 3 branches in science?
BiologyChemistryGeologyYou have:Life ScienceEarth Science(Some other science that I cannot think of the name at the moment.)
Science of god?
Some science suggests that a god may exist. However there is still no proof to prove that god does exist. Actually, there's no proof to prove that science exists either, but don't let that bother you. Just take our word for it. Would we get something this important wrong?
If science shows God is a delusion why are so many scientists Christians?
Some people is Science, especially a few in Physics are in Science to prove the existence of god to the world, and say that much Scientific Evidence points to a god, and some say the evidence points to natural process.
Why can scientists never prove their findings?
Scientists cannot prove their findings definitively because science is always open to new evidence and interpretations. Instead, findings are supported by evidence and reproducibility, increasing confidence in their accuracy but never being completely certain. The goal of science is to continually refine and improve our understanding of the natural world based on the best available evidence.
What describes the limit of science?
The main limit of science is that everything that happens cannot be explained. Some things are simply phenomenon, and the reasons they happened are unclear.
What best describes the limits science?
The main limit of science is that everything that happens cannot be explained. Some things are simply phenomenon, and the reasons they happened are unclear.
Why would some people view the phrase scientific religion as an oxymoron?
It may have to do with people's views on science and religion in general. For most people, science is the systematic pursuit of knowledge based on repeatable, observable experiments. Scientific "truths" are never set in stone, as they are free to be modified with the discovery of new evidence. Religion, although it is also a pursuit of knowledge, does not have this flexibility and cannot be changed to fit new evidence. Any such religion that is as open to constructive change as science is would be a poor one indeed, or at least an unrecognizable one.
What are eternal truths that are acceptable to both theists and atheists?
Pythagoras discovered eternal truths in mathematics. While his religious teachings, based around these eternal truths, are no longer followed in the modern world, mathematics is seen philosophically as based on provable truths, acceptable to theists and atheists alike.Atheists are likely to accept what science teaches, as are most theists. However, not everything that science teaches is an eternal truth, in that scientists are constantly attempting to challenge accepted theories and will update them in the light of new information. Some theists take this as a weakness of science and cherry-pick the science they are willing to accept and those they refuse to accept, often on spurious grounds.Ethics ought also be a fertile ground for eternal truths, since every age believes that what is right to do will always be right to do, and what is wrong to do will always be wrong to do. Some theists claim the high moral ground because their God gives them immutable guidance on what is right. However, a study of, for example, Christian ethics shows how teachings have both changed and diversified over the centuries. An extreme example is how slavery was once thought consistent with Christianity, even approved in the Bible, but is now considered abhorrent.If we exclude faith-based 'truths' that can not be shared by atheists, and indeed are not even shared by all theists, there are few eternal truths outside mathematics and, to some extent, science.
How do you answer a guy when he says prove that you miss me?
tell him when you two are apart your heart weaps. Answer It's difficult to prove to someone that you miss them if you cannot see them in person but you can tell him that you think about him all the time, that you cannot wait to see him again, that your life is not the same without him in it, that some days you miss him so much that your heart aches and you are filled with sadness. Then tell him you'll prove how much you missed him when you see him again. :-)
What are some quotes from Rosalind Franklin?
"Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated." "The question of how the structure of the protein molecule is related to the function of the living cell is one of the great questions of biology." "Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated." "Knowledge only progresses if it is based on evidence. We cannot progress by simply making a guess, and then defending our guess with emotional rhetoric."
Why is Skepticism important in science?
To avoid pre-conceived notions of truth, which may cause some people to discard evidence which contradicts their theory. In my opinion, science should be used to become right, rather than prove yourself right.
