The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numerals are possible.
There is no such number since the order of the characters is very important in Roman numerals and the given example has no ordered structure.
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numeral is possible.
448 already IS in Hindi-Arabic numerals
192 already IS in Hindi-Arabic numerals.
27 already is written in Hindi-Arabic numerals. (The Hindi-Arabic numerals are 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and 9)
There is no such number since the order of the characters is very important in Roman numerals and the given example has no ordered structure.
The given numerals are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore no equivalent Hindu-Arabic numeral is possible.
448 already IS in Hindi-Arabic numerals
192 already IS in Hindi-Arabic numerals.
27 already is written in Hindi-Arabic numerals. (The Hindi-Arabic numerals are 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and 9)
84 already is written in Hindi-Arabic numerals. If you want it converted to Roman numerals, it's LXXXIV
They are actually called Hindu-Arabic numerals, so named because the system originated in India and was brought to Europe by the Western Arabs.
945
21
14
767.
160