In one sense, there really is no similarity beyond that there is some form of leader or group of leaders of many people, and that the governed have some mechanism(s) to replace faulty government - Democracy votes, Dictatorships are forced to revolt or otherwise force the leader out of office. However, Democracy and a Dictatorship are two polar opposite forms of government. One is government of the people, by the people, where all of the governed choose representatives to speak in public office, vote, and generally agree on decisions before they are made. Each part of a democratic government holds a part of the power, and the people can take that power away and give it to somebody that they deem more fit for the task. In a dictatorship, there is a sole leader. A specific person or group usually chooses that leader, or in some cases, that leader takes over by force. The leader does not need to listen to their people, they make their own decisions. There is no share of power; the dictator has absolute power, including over their own position as dictator. While both are perfectly capable of both great good and great corruption, the way in which they work by bare definition is exactly opposite from one another.
The question does not make sense. Socialism is an economic system, dictatorship is a political system. There are many democratic states with socialist economies. Many dictatorships have had capitalist economies.
pie
The similarities between a monarchy and constitutional monarchy are that their are both monarchies.
The Communist (Stalin's) revolution led from an absolute Monarchy to a dictatorship run by Joseph Stalin. The American revolution Led from administration by a parliamentary Monarchy to a Democracy.
This depends on what powers the monarch retains. If the monarch is an absolutist, monarchy will be in opposition to democracy. However, numerous monarchies are constitutional monarchies where the monarch has ceded some or most of his power to democratically elected institutions.
everything, libertarianism is democracy and democracy is libertarianism.
there really is none the only similarity is that sometimes in a dictatorship you vote for the dictator and in a parlimentary democracy you vote for representatives
If the monarchy is not a constitutional monarchy, then essentially they are all dictatorships.
There are elections.
According to the Democracy Index, it's in the limbo between being a democracy and a dictatorship (similar to Russia).
The comparison between democracy and dictatorship entails comparing the rights enjoyed by the citizens under each. Under dictatorship, the government has the power from the military hence intimidation and oppression is rampant. The plus side is that it boasts lower crime rates. Under democracy, the citizenry are free and enjoy all their basic human rights. The downside though, is that the decision making machinery is slow. The different types of democracy are direct, indirect and elite democracy. The types of dictatorship are Communism, monarchy, oligarchy and fascism.
Dictatorship and Democracy are both form of governance. Dictatorship is ruled by a tyrant leader while Democracy is ruled by the majority and is for the common welfare of its subjects. The similarity between the two is that they are widely seen as a type of governance and such cannot exist without its subject or citizen to be ruled upon. Similarities are very few between the two, however, both are forms of political control. Democracy and dictatorship both involve a central figure of authority, since there is not "true" form of democracy. An example, Obama and Mussolini are both central authoritative figures. If we were talking about a true democracy, a similarity could lie in the fact that neither are very effective. Whereas a true democracy would get nothing done because of disagreement, a dictatorship might make all of the wrong decisions because there is no dissent. They're are both ineffective forms of extreme governing.
they both do stuff